Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Porcine Cardiac Arrest Model Using an Implantable Defibrillator
Published on: January 9, 2026
Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy
Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar1, David Newman, Miney Paquette
1Division of Cardiology, The University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. K.Nanthakumar@uhn.on.ca
Objectives:
We studied the effect of varying shock capacitance, shock impedance, and pulse duration on defibrillation efficacy in a randomized, crossover manner for biphasic shocks.
Background:
The relationship between the electrical determinants of defibrillation efficacy is incompletely understood.
Methods:
Biphasic shocks were delivered to 12 dogs through epicardial patches (to vary impedance) after 15 seconds of ventricular fibrillation using one of 100- or 155-muF capacitors at each of four pulse durations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 ms), in a balanced random order. There were two impedance groups: six with higher impedance (mean 97 +/- 15 Omega, range 80-120) and six with lower impedance (mean 39 +/- 3 Omega, range 34-44). Voltage requirements were estimated as the average of three defibrillation threshold (DFT) tests.
Results:
Shock capacitance, resistance, and pulse duration all had significant effects upon the minimum voltage DFT (P = .0065, P = .0066, and P = .0001, respectively). The tilt associated with the lowest voltage and current requirement for each of the four capacitance/resistance combinations varied widely, between 34 +/- 5% and 63 +/- 3%, depending on capacitance and impedance. The optimal pulse duration associated with minimum DFT lies between 5.11 and 5.34 ms.
Conclusions:
Defibrillation voltage requirements for biphasic shocks are affected by pulse duration, capacitance and impedance, but not "tilt."
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

