Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Viewpoint: pancakes and medical statistics.

Shetal I Shah1

  • 1New York University Medical Center, New York, 10010, USA.

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
|April 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Physicians must critically evaluate medical literature, as the peer-review process increasingly allows errors. Enhanced statistical knowledge is crucial for ensuring authentic evidence-based medicine (EBM).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Equipping perinatal teams to practice climate-smart healthcare.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2026
Same author

Legislative remedies to mitigate the national emergency in pediatric mental health.

Pediatric research·2022
Same author

Before the first breath: why ambient air pollution and climate change should matter to neonatal-perinatal providers.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2022
Same author

US state policies for Medicaid coverage of donor human milk.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2022
Same author

Restricting the Sale of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Flavors.

Pediatrics·2021
Same author

Healthcare and human rights: a reflection.

Pediatric research·2021

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Physicians strive for authentic care, seeking the most accurate knowledge for patient treatment.
  • Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is prominent due to resource constraints and the need for efficient diagnosis.
  • The peer-review system is traditionally trusted to ensure the quality of clinical literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To question the reliability of the peer-review process in safeguarding clinical literature from errors.
  • To emphasize the need for clinicians to actively assess the validity of medical research.
  • To propose improvements in medical education regarding statistical and experimental design evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of the current peer-review system's effectiveness.
  • Examination of the challenges physicians face in discerning authentic medical knowledge.
  • Speculation on the reasons for declining peer-review efficacy.

Main Results:

  • Errors are increasingly prevalent in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
  • Physicians cannot automatically trust published research due to systemic flaws.
  • The current peer-review system is insufficient in ensuring the authenticity of medical evidence.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians must develop expertise in evaluating experimental design and statistical analysis.
  • Medical education should incorporate basic statistics as an entry requirement for medical school.
  • Physicians need to proactively assume responsibility for validating the evidence they use in practice.

Related Experiment Videos