Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Detecting adverse drug reactions on paediatric wards: intensified surveillance versus computerised screening of
Steffen Haffner1, Nicoletta von Laue, Stefan Wirth
1The Philipp Klee-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.
Insights
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children occur frequently, similar to adults. Intensified surveillance detects more severe ADRs than computer-assisted screening, though it requires more staff.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pharmacology
- Patient Safety
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.
- Evaluating ADRs in pediatric populations is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Two distinct methodological approaches were compared for ADR detection in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of two methods for detecting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in hospitalized children.
- To determine the incidence and types of ADRs in a pediatric hospital setting.
- To assess the severity and attributability of ADRs identified by different surveillance methods.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study was conducted over 3 months in pediatric general wards and intensive care units.
- Two methods were employed: intensified surveillance by a physician and computer-assisted screening of laboratory parameters.
- ADRs were assessed for type, incidence, severity, and causal relationship.
Main Results:
- 14.1% of children experienced an ADR during hospitalization; 2.7% were admitted due to ADRs.
- Intensified surveillance detected more ADRs (11.9%) with greater severity, primarily gastrointestinal, skin, and CNS disorders.
- Computer-assisted screening identified fewer ADRs (5.7%), mainly blood dyscrasia and liver damage, with lower sensitivity (44.8%) but acceptable specificity (72.8%).
Conclusions:
- Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur with similar frequency in pediatric and adult patients.
- Intensified surveillance is more effective in detecting a higher number and more severe ADRs in children compared to computer-assisted screening.
- The choice of surveillance method impacts ADR detection rates and severity assessment, with intensified surveillance requiring greater personnel resources.
Background:
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) contribute significantly to patient morbidity and mortality, as well as to costs for healthcare systems. Our aim was to evaluate the type and incidence of ADRs in a paediatric hospital population, comparatively ascertained by two different methodological approaches.
Methods:
Our prospective study enrolled all patients admitted to two of the general children wards (46 beds) and the paediatric intensive care unit (6 beds) at the HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal teaching hospital in Germany, over the study period of 3 months. We used two methods to detect ADRs. The intensified surveillance system relied on a trained physician conducting ward rounds and assessing patient charts. The computer-assisted screening of pathological laboratory parameters used values slightly below or above the age-specific normal range as a trigger signal for a potential ADR, which was subsequently assessed by trained personnel.
Results:
By applying both methods simultaneously we observed that 14.1% of children experienced an ADR while they were hospitalised and 2.7% of children were admitted to hospital because of the ADR. Intensified surveillance resulted in the detection of 101 ADRs in 11.9% of patients, predominantly presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms, skin and CNS disorders; computer-assisted screening identified 45 ADRs in 5.7% of patients, mainly with drug-induced blood dyscrasia and liver damage. Furthermore, the ADRs detected by the intensified method were more severe, affected younger children and showed a closer causal attributability to the reaction than the ADRs observed by the computerised method. The spectra of drugs involved were similar, with the anti-infectives being suspected most frequently. The sensitivities of the intensified surveillance system and the computerised surveillance screening came to 67.2% and 44.8%, respectively, with computer-assisted screening having a specificity of 72.8%. The mean positive predictive value of the pathological laboratory values under surveillance by computer-assisted screening was 18.6%. Approximately 25% of ADR-related drugs administered were used for off-label indications.
Conclusion:
Using the published literature for comparison, we found that ADRs occur as frequently in paediatric patients as in adult patients. Intensified surveillance and computerised surveillance applied in the paediatric setting show substantial differences in their detection specificities. A higher number of and more severe ADRs can be detected by intensified surveillance than by computerised surveillance, but require higher personnel resources.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
