Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Published on: February 16, 2024
Predictive factors of positive findings in patients explored by push enteroscopy for unexplained GI bleeding
Céline Lepère1, Emmanuel Cuillerier, André Van Gossum
1Department of Gastroenterology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.
Background:
The diagnostic yield of push enteroscopy (PE) in patients with unexplained overt GI bleeding is about 30%. The aim of this study was to assess for predictive factors of positive findings.
Methods:
A total of 182 patients referred to two endoscopic centers (European Georges Pompidou Hospital [Paris, France] and Erasmus Hospital [Brussels, Belgium]) for unexplained overt GI bleeding (melena [57%], hematochezia [26%], or hematochezia associated with melena [17%]) were included in this retrospective study. Predictive factors associated with positive findings at upper PE were studied by using uni- and multivariate analysis.
Results:
The overall diagnostic yield of upper PE was 34% (62/182), but lesions were found beyond the second duodenum in 25% of the patients (45/182). Factors significantly associated with positive findings at upper PE were the following. (1) In univariate analysis: the presence of melena, Hb level <7 g/dL, blood transfusion >4 units per patient, chronic renal failure, disorder of hemostasis or effective anticoagulant treatment, history of intestinal arteriovenous malformation, and age > 65 years. (2) In multivariate analysis: chronic renal failure and presence of melena. If only jejunal lesions were considered, chronic renal failure was the only predictive factor associated with positive findings at upper PE in multivariate analysis. The severity of GI bleeding did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06). Delay between GI bleeding and PE, number of previous standard endoscopies and previous episodes of bleeding were not associated with positive findings in upper PE.
Conclusions:
In patients with unexplained overt GI bleeding, upper PE has a higher diagnostic yield in patients with chronic renal failure and patients with melena (vs. hematochezia).
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Injurious Factors
In the antrum region, G cells secrete the gastrin hormone that binds to gastrin-cholecystokinin-B (CCK2) receptors on parietal and enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells in the fundic glands. Simultaneously, the vagus nerve releases acetylcholine, which binds to M3...