Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Imaging Features of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
Published on: June 16, 2020
Classification and diagnostic criteria in systemic vasculitis
1The Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, 1B.23, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Insights
Vasculitis classification schemes have evolved over 50 years, considering vessel size and disease features. However, robust diagnostic criteria for these autoimmune inflammatory conditions remain challenging to establish.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Over 20 primary forms of vasculitis exist, with varied classification approaches over the past 50 years.
- Existing classification schemes consider vessel size, demographics, organ involvement, inflammation type, immune complexes, and autoantibodies.
- Despite advancements, substantial knowledge gaps persist, impacting comprehensive classification and diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolution and limitations of vasculitis classification schemes.
- To highlight the utility of American College of Rheumatology criteria in research.
- To discuss the impact of the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference on nomenclature.
Main Methods:
- Review of historical and contemporary classification systems for vasculitis.
- Analysis of factors influencing classification: vessel size, pathophysiology, and serological markers.
- Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and nomenclature consensus.
Main Results:
- Multiple classification schemes have been proposed, focusing on vessel size and disease characteristics.
- American College of Rheumatology criteria aid patient selection for research studies.
- The Chapel Hill Consensus Conference improved nomenclature for systemic vasculitides.
Conclusions:
- Current classification systems for vasculitis have inherent limitations due to incomplete understanding.
- While nomenclature has been refined, definitive diagnostic criteria for all vasculitis forms are still needed.
- Further research is essential to develop robust diagnostic and classification tools for vasculitis.
Abstract:
Approximately 20 different primary forms of vasculitis are recognized, not all of which have been included in classification schemes or consensus statements regarding nomenclature. A variety of classification schemes have been proposed over the past 50 years, many predicated upon the size of the primary type of vessel involved in a given disease, as well as other considerations that include demographic features, organ tropism, the presence or absence of granulomatous inflammation, the role of immune complexes in pathophysiology and the association of autoantibodies with some forms of vasculitis. All classification schemes to date have had shortcomings owing to the substantial gaps in knowledge about vasculitis, but the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of some forms of vasculitis are useful for the purpose of including patients in research studies. The Chapel Hill Consensus Conference has clarified some existing controversies in nomenclature of the systemic vasculitides. Robust diagnostic criteria for the various forms of vasculitis have, however, remained elusive.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests