Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Screening hospital employees for measles immunity is more cost effective than blind immunization
J A Sellick1, D Longbine, R Schifeling
1State University of New York, Buffalo.
Objective:
To examine alternative strategies in developing a cost-effective program to assure measles immunity among hospital employees.
Design:
Observational.
Setting:
Referral teaching hospital.
Participants:
Eighteen hundred "established" hospital employees with potential patient contact and 630 newly hired hospital employees.
Interventions:
Established employees born after 1 January 1957 and all newly hired employees were screened for serologic evidence of measles immunity and immunized if necessary.
Measurements:
Cost analysis.
Results:
The cost of screening and directed immunization of established employees was $3.98 per employee compared with a potential cost of $10.03 to $42.80 per employee if all employees were "blindly" immunized with monovalent measles vaccine or trivalent mumps-measles-rubella vaccine. The cost of the screening and directed immunization of new employees was $2.42 per employee compared with potential costs of $8.30 to $39.34 per employee for blind immunization. These analyses assumed that varying percentages of employees would be able to produce documentation of having received a previous dose of vaccine or of having had measles.
Conclusions:
In a large referral hospital, screening for measles immunity followed by directed immunization was considerably less expensive than immunizing all potentially susceptible employees.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Blinding

