Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Reproducibility and variability of activated clotting time measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory
Terence M Doherty1, Robert M Shavelle, William J French
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA.
Insights
The activated clotting time (ACT) test shows significant variability between HemoTec and Hemochron devices. Results are not comparable in therapeutic ranges, with HemoTec demonstrating superior reproducibility for heparinization management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Diagnostics
- Medical Device Evaluation
- Point-of-Care Testing
Background:
- Activated clotting time (ACT) is a critical point-of-care test for managing heparinization during cardiac catheterization.
- Lack of standardization leads to significant variability in ACT results across different instruments.
- Understanding device-specific performance is crucial for accurate clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the reproducibility and variability of ACT measurements between the HemoTec ACT and Hemochron 801 instruments.
- To assess the comparability of ACT results from these two devices, particularly within therapeutic ranges.
- To evaluate the overall performance and reliability of each ACT device.
Main Methods:
- Duplicate paired ACT tests were performed on 359 patients using both HemoTec and Hemochron devices (n=885).
- Prothrombin times (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) were measured on subsets of samples.
- Statistical analyses were employed to determine performance, reproducibility, and relationships between the devices.
Main Results:
- While the average difference between devices was 8 seconds, over 60% of measurements varied by more than 10%, and over 25% varied by more than 20%.
- The HemoTec instrument exhibited superior reproducibility (mean CV 2.4% ± 3.1%) compared to the Hemochron (7.2% ± 6.1%; P < 0.00001).
- ACT results from HemoTec and Hemochron were nonlinear and not comparable within the therapeutic range of 200-350 seconds.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in ACT measurements between HemoTec and Hemochron devices.
- The HemoTec ACT demonstrates better overall performance and reproducibility than the Hemochron 801.
- Clinical decisions based on ACT values should consider the specific instrument used due to non-comparable results.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to characterize the reproducibility and variability in the measurement to the activated clotting time (ACT) when performed on two different types of instruments, the HemoTec ACT (Medtronic) and the Hemochron 801 (International Technidyne). The ACT has evolved into the most common point-of-care test used in the cardiac catheterization lab to manage patient heparinization. Since the test has not been standardized, different systems frequently produce different results under the same clinical conditions. Duplicate paired ACT tests (n = 885) from 359 patients were performed on both instruments. Prothrombin times (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) were also determined on subsets of these same samples (PT = 533; aPTT = 487). The performance and relationships between the two tests were determined using a variety of statistical analytical techniques. The average difference between the ACT devices was only 8 sec, yet more than 60% of the measurements varied by more than 10%. Over one-fourth of measurements varied by more than 20%. The reproducibility to the HemoTec instrument was superior to the Hemochron instrument across the entire range of ACTs measured (mean coefficient of variation 2.4% +/- 3.1% vs. 7.2% +/- 6.1% for HemoTec and Hemochron, respectively; P < 0.00001; range = 65-555 sec). The relationship between the two ACTs was nonlinear. In therapeutic ranges used for interventional procedures (200-350 sec), HemoTec and Hemochron ACTs are not comparable to one another. Statistical comparative analysis indicated that the HemoTec ACT has better overall performance.
More Related Videos
09:38A Microfluidic Flow Chamber Model for Platelet Transfusion and Hemostasis Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Formation in Real-time
Published on: February 14, 2017
08:01The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay: Simultaneous Fluorogenic Measurement of Thrombin and Plasmin Generation in a Single Well
Published on: February 27, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization