Related Experiment Videos
Interdisciplinary conflict analysis and conflict mitigation in local resource management
1Gothenburg University, Human Ecology Section, Sweden. karl.bruckmeier@he.gu.se
Ambio
|May 4, 2005
Summary
This study reviews resource and conflict research from the Sustainable Coastal Zone Management (SUCOZOMA) program. It highlights methods for stakeholder analysis and conflict mitigation in coastal resource management.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Social Science
- Resource Management
Background:
- Swedish research program SUCOZOMA focused on Sustainable Coastal Zone Management.
- Previous studies detailed specific conflict research results, necessitating a synthesized overview.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and generalize key findings from SUCOZOMA's resource and conflict studies.
- To present the integrated methodology used for analyzing environmental and resource use conflicts.
Main Methods:
- Interdisciplinary and theoretical research on environmental and resource use conflicts.
- Combined stakeholder and conflict analysis: mapping stakeholders, analyzing conflicts, developing mitigation methods, and integrating into management systems.
- Case studies on the Swedish west and east coasts, including fisheries, aquaculture, and species protection conflicts.
Main Results:
- Identified key stakeholders and their interests in coastal resource use.
- Analyzed various resource use conflicts, including those between species protection and coastal fisheries.
- Developed and tested methods for conflict mitigation and cooperation.
Conclusions:
- Integrated conflict management is crucial for sustainable coastal zone management.
- The role of scientists as stakeholders in conflict research requires special attention.
- Effective management involves knowledge transfer, institutional development, and cooperation between scientists and resource users.