Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026
Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration (E-TTNA) for Sampling of Lung Nodules
Published on: May 23, 2015
Multi-detector row CT: is prospective electrocardiographic triggering improving the detection of small pulmonary
Sandra Pauls1, Andrik J Aschoff, Juliane Wahl
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Ulm, Steinhoevelstr. 9, 89075 Ulm, Germany. sandra.pauls@medizin.uni-ulm.de
Rationale And Objectives:
To compare prospectively ECG-triggered multi-detector row computed tomography (ECG-MDR-CT) and multi-detector row computed tomography (MDR-CT) without triggering for the detection of pulmonary tumors.
Materials And Methods:
100 patients with proven or suspected tumors were referred for CT of the lung for staging of lung metastases. First, a non-enhanced scan was performed using prospective ECG-triggering on a four-row multidetector helical CT scanner, followed by a contrast-enhanced scan without triggering. The diagnostic assessibility in detecting intrapulmonary nodules and mediastinal structures was graded using a 5-point scale (rated 1 = bad to 5 = very good image quality).
Results:
ECG-MDR-CT images detected a total of 26% more pulmonary nodules than MDR-CT. For tumors <5 mm, the detection rate was 62% higher using ECG-triggered scans (P = .024). Subjective assessment found median demarcation ratings for all pulmonary findings of 4 (ECG-MDR-CT) versus 3 (MDR-CT). Mediastinal structures were delineated better using ECG triggering. The median ranking for demarcation of pulmonary findings <10 mm was 4 on ECG-MDR-CT and 3 on MDR-CT, respectively. For vessels and the left bronchus, the median of demarcation was 4 on triggered images and 2 on MDR-CT, respectively. The median values referring to the demarcation of mediastinal structures were not significantly different between ECG-MDR-CT and MDR-CT.
Conclusion:
Our data indicate the superiority of prospectively triggered ECG-MDR-CT over MDR-CT for the diagnosis of small pulmonary tumors using a 4-row multidetector CT.
