Kinetic evaluation of polyamines as radical scavengers
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Detection of Nitric Oxide and Superoxide Radical Anion by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy from Cells using Spin Traps
Published on: August 18, 2012
Seiichiro Fujisawa1, Yoshinori Kadoma
1Department of Oral Diagnosis, Meikai University School of Dentistry, Sakado, Saitama 350-0283, Japan. fujisawa@dent.meikai.ac.jp
Abstract:
To clarify whether polyamines scavenge alkyl (carbon-centered) and peroxy (oxygen-centered) radicals, we analyzed their effects on the kinetics of polymerization of methyl methacrylate (MMA) induced by 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, a R* radical) and benzoyl peroxide (BPO, a PhCOO* radical) under nearly anaerobic conditions. Stoichiometric factors (n; number of free radicals trapped by one mole of antioxidant moiety) were determined by the induction period method. The n value for polyamines (putrescine, spermidine and spermine) was 0.1-0.7, whereas that for conventional synthetic antioxidants, BHA and BHT, was about 2. These n values were not different between the AIBN and BPO systems. The n value for polyamines declined in the order spermine > spermidine > putrescine. The K(inh)/K(p) value for polyamines (20-115) was greater than that (4-7) for BHT or BHA. Radical-scavenging activity largely depends on the stoichiometric factor of antioxidants rather than their effects on initial rate of polymerization, a rate of propagation. Polyamines may scavenge alkyl or peroxy radicals derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids in biological systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
Along with electronic factors, steric factors also account...
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
Radical Reactivity: Overview
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: Organic Radicals
Physical Properties of Amines
Radical Autoxidation

