Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings.

Florian Waszak1, Bernhard Hommel, Alan Allport

  • 1Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Munich, Germany. waszak@psy.mpg.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When less is more: single selfhood-related cues elicit higher selfhood ratings than multiple cues.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Altered neural oscillatory dynamics underlie reduced anticipatory schema use during event segmentation in adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

How the influence of cingulate-lingual interactions on event segmentation changes from early to late adolescence.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Learning from feedback is independent from feedback visibility, but supported by aperiodic neural activity.

NeuroImage·2026

Switching between tasks incurs a cost, even with preparation time. This study shows task-switching costs are largely due to proactive interference from previous stimulus-task experiences, especially with semantically related stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Task switching is often inefficient, even when individuals have preparation time.
  • The residual task shift cost describes the difficulty in switching tasks.
  • Previous research suggests priming effects contribute to this cost.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the underlying mechanisms of residual task shift cost.
  • To examine the role of stimulus-response priming in task switching.
  • To determine if task-priming effects generalize to semantically related stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task-switching paradigm involving picture naming and word reading.
  • Picture-word Stroop stimuli were used to create competing task demands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on response times and error rates to quantify task shift costs.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant task shift cost was observed, consistent with prior research.
    • Priming from prior stimulus-response episodes substantially contributed to the observed cost.
    • The task-priming effect extended to semantically related stimuli, indicating generalization.

    Conclusions:

    • Residual task shift costs are largely attributable to proactive interference from previous stimulus-task episodes.
    • Task-priming effects demonstrate a generalization mechanism influencing cognitive control.
    • These findings suggest that cognitive control processes are sensitive to semantic relationships between stimuli.