Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting true patterns of cognitive performance from noisy data.

W Todd Maddox1, W K Estes

  • 1Department of Psychology, Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712-0187, USA. maddox@psy.utexas.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acoustilytix™: A Web-Based Automated Ultrasonic Vocalization Scoring Platform.

Brain sciences·2021
Same author

Spontaneous Ultrasonic Vocalization Transmission in Adult, Male Long-Evans Rats Is Age-Dependent and Sensitive to EtOH Modulation.

Brain sciences·2020
Same author

Procedural-Memory, Working-Memory, and Declarative-Memory Skills Are Each Associated With Dimensional Integration in Sound-Category Learning.

Frontiers in psychology·2018
Same author

Increased cognitive load enables unlearning in procedural category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2018
Same author

Alcohol-naïve USVs distinguish male HAD-1 from LAD-1 rat strains.

Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)·2018
Same author

Quantitative modeling of category learning deficits in various patient populations.

Neuropsychology·2018
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a framework for assessing cognitive models by evaluating their ability to reveal true individual cognitive processes from noisy data. The approach enhances model identifiability and testability, improving understanding of cognitive performance.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Cognitive modeling aims to understand individual cognitive processes.
  • Observed performance data is inherently noisy, comprising true performance and error.
  • Assessing the validity of cognitive models is crucial for reliable insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general theoretical framework for assessing cognitive models.
  • To evaluate models based on their capacity to yield information about true individual performance patterns and underlying cognitive processes.
  • To address the challenge of inferring true performance from noisy data.

Main Methods:

  • Formal derivations for inference from noisy data to true performance.
  • Development of a theoretical framework for model assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of model fits to simulated data.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed framework provides a method for assessing cognitive models.
    • Formal derivations address the problem of separating true performance from error.
    • Simulated data analyses demonstrate the approach's utility in handling model identifiability and testability.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed framework offers a robust method for evaluating cognitive models.
    • The approach effectively handles noisy data, improving inference of true cognitive processes.
    • This work contributes to more reliable and testable cognitive models.