Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Appropriateness of total hip joint replacement
Jose M Quintana1, Antonio Escobar, Jesus Azkarate
1Hospital de Galdakao, Unidad de Investigacion, Vizcaya, Spain. jmquinta@hgda.osakidetza.net
Insights
This study found that while most total hip replacements were appropriate, there were variations between hospitals. Overall, the appropriateness of hip replacement surgery has improved over time.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Hip osteoarthritis is a common condition requiring surgical intervention.
- Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed procedure to manage hip osteoarthritis.
- Evaluating the appropriateness of THA is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the appropriateness of total hip replacement (THR) utilization in patients with hip osteoarthritis.
- To identify variations in THA appropriateness and patient outcomes across different hospitals.
- To compare current THA appropriateness rates with historical data.
Main Methods:
- An observational study involving 784 consecutive patients undergoing THA for hip osteoarthritis across seven hospitals.
- Appropriateness of THA was evaluated using RAND methodology-derived explicit criteria.
- Patient outcomes, including hospital stay and recovery, were assessed at 6 months post-discharge.
Main Results:
- Indications for THA were deemed necessary in 52.2%, appropriate in 21.3%, uncertain in 21.4%, and inappropriate in 5.1% of cases.
- Significant inter-hospital variations were observed in appropriateness rates, patient recovery, and length of hospital stay.
- Improvements in THA appropriateness rates were noted across all participating hospitals compared to a previous study.
Conclusions:
- A low percentage of inappropriate indications for THA was identified, with notable variations between healthcare centers.
- While improvements in THA appropriateness have occurred, methodological differences limit direct comparison with prior studies.
- Further research is needed to understand and address the observed variations in THA utilization and outcomes.
Objective:
To evaluate the appropriateness of the use of total hip joint replacements.
Design:
Observational study of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis and who had undergone total hip arthroplasty over a 1-year period from seven hospitals.
Main Measures:
The appropriateness of the use of hip replacement was judged by explicit criteria developed by a panel of experts using RAND methodology. The length of hospital stay during the admission and complications were recorded 6 months post-operatively. Patients were also surveyed 6 months after discharge to determine whether they believed they had recovered or their satisfaction with the intervention. Appropriateness results of this study were compared with a previous study performed with the same criteria 4 years previously.
Results:
In total, 784 patients participated in the study. Indications for surgery were considered necessary in 52.2% of cases, appropriate in 21.3%, uncertain in 21.4%, and inappropriate in 5.1%. Differences were found in the rates of appropriateness exclusively from one hospital. At 6 months after discharge, differences between centres were found for the proportion of patients that reported they had recovered from surgery (range 57.7-24.8%) and in the length of hospital stay during admission (range 10-16 days). Improvement in the appropriateness rates were found for all participant hospitals during both periods.
Conclusions:
We identified a low percentage of inappropriate indications and differences in some outcomes between centres. Compared with previously, there has been improvement in the use of this technique, although both periods are not methodologically comparable.
