Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

GMCheck: Bayesian error checking for pedigree genotypes and phenotypes.

Alun Thomas1

  • 1Department of Medical Informatics and Center for High Performance Computing, University of Utah 391 Chipeta Way Suite D, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. alun@genepi.med.utah.edu

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|May 10, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Calculating the Probability that a Previously Susceptible Individual is Infected as a Function of Time Following Exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Infectious diseases and therapy·2026
Same author

Molecular features unique to circulating tumor DNA enable the tumor-naïve liquid biopsy of glioblastoma.

NPJ precision oncology·2026
Same author

When two plus four does not equal six: Combining computational and functional evidence to classify BRCA1 key domain missense substitutions.

American journal of human genetics·2025
Same author

Conserved noncoding cis elements associated with hibernation modulate metabolic and behavioral adaptations in mice.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

When Two plus Four Does Not Equal Six: Combining Computational and Functional Evidence to Classify BRCA1 Key Domain Missense Substitutions.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Conserved Noncoding Cis-Elements Associated with Hibernation Modulate Metabolic and Behavioral Adaptations in Mice.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

GMCheck identifies potential genetic data errors using graphical models. This tool calculates the probability of errors in genotypes or phenotypes within a family tree structure.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Accurate genotype and phenotype data are crucial for genetic studies.
  • Data errors can significantly impact the reliability of genetic analyses and conclusions.
  • Existing methods for detecting genetic data errors may have limitations in complex pedigree structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce GMCheck, a novel tool for detecting genetic data errors.
  • To leverage graphical modeling for robust error detection in genetic data.
  • To assess the probability of errors in genotypes and phenotypes within defined pedigrees.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes graphical modeling to represent pedigree structures and genetic relationships.
  • Calculates posterior probabilities of data errors based on observed genotypes and phenotypes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applies Bayesian inference to estimate error likelihoods.

    • Main Results:

    • GMCheck effectively identifies potential data errors in genetic datasets.
    • The tool provides quantitative measures (posterior probabilities) of error likelihood.
    • Demonstrates the utility of graphical models in pinpointing specific data inconsistencies.

    Conclusions:

    • GMCheck offers a powerful and flexible approach for genetic data quality control.
    • The methodology enhances the accuracy of genetic analyses by identifying erroneous data points.
    • Graphical modeling provides a robust framework for error detection in complex genetic pedigrees.