Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

09:21
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Stroke outcomes in Northern Scotland: does rurality really matter?
1Highlands and Islands Health Research Institute, The Green House, Beechwood Business Park North, Inverness, Scotland, UK. Noelle.O'Neill@hhb.scot.nhs.uk
Rural and Remote Health
|May 11, 2005
Summary
Stroke outcomes in remote Scotland are comparable to urban areas, with no disadvantage in service provision. However, functional recovery could be improved for all stroke patients, regardless of location.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Neurology
- Rural Health
Background:
- Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability in Scotland.
- Rural populations may experience poorer health outcomes due to accessibility issues.
- Limited research exists on stroke care and outcomes in remote and rural settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the incidence and outcomes of first-ever stroke in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland.
- To investigate if remoteness and rurality impact stroke care and patient outcomes.
- To compare stroke care and outcomes between remote rural and urban/accessible settlements.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, community-based, observational survey of first-ever stroke patients over 12 months.
- Data collection on functional limitation and service provision at 1, 3, and 6 months post-stroke.
- Settlements categorized as urban/accessible, remote rural, and very remote using the Scottish Household Survey.
Main Results:
- 85 patients included in the final dataset; remote rural and very remote patients were over-represented.
- Likelihood of returning home from acute hospitals was not related to settlement category.
- Patients in remote rural areas were more likely to be admitted to and remain in community hospitals at 6 months.
- Two-thirds of patients experienced some disability; one-third remained independent.
- Barthel Index scores improved over time, indicating reduced disability.
- Service uptake was similar across all settlement categories, with low overall utilization, particularly for social-support and stroke-specific services.
Conclusions:
- Low reported stroke incidence may be due to various factors including death, diagnostic uncertainty, or under-reporting.
- Higher community hospital admission in remote rural areas may reflect service availability or stroke severity.
- Low uptake of rehabilitation and support services suggests an unmet need, impacting functional outcomes across all areas.
- Patients in remote and rural Scotland do not appear disadvantaged in stroke outcomes or service utilization compared to urban counterparts.
- Functional outcomes for stroke patients could be enhanced in all settlement categories.
