Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Usefulness of embolic protection devices during saphenous vein graft intervention in a nonselected population
Leslie A Webb1, Simon R Dixon, Robert D Safian
1William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA.
Insights
Distal embolic protection devices aid saphenous vein graft interventions. However, anatomical limitations exist, with 77% of analyzed cases suitable for embolic protection systems.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Distal embolic protection devices (DEPDs) minimize complications during saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions.
- Anatomical constraints can limit the routine application of DEPDs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the eligibility of SVG interventions for proximal or distal embolic protection systems (EPS).
- To identify anatomical and lesion-related factors influencing EPS suitability.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of angiograms from 624 consecutive SVG interventions.
- Evaluation of case eligibility for proximal and distal EPS based on anatomical and lesion characteristics.
Main Results:
- Overall, 483 (77%) of SVG interventions were deemed suitable for an embolic protection device.
- Eligibility for proximal EPS was observed in 59% of cases.
- Eligibility for distal EPS was noted in 57% of cases.
Conclusions:
- A significant majority of saphenous vein graft interventions are anatomically suitable for embolic protection systems.
- Proximal and distal embolic protection systems demonstrate comparable eligibility rates in SVG interventions.
Abstract:
Distal embolic protection devices have been shown to reduce the risk of peri-procedural complications associated with saphenous vein graft intervention. However, there are several important anatomic limitations that may preclude routine device use. We analyzed the angiograms of 624 consecutive saphenous vein graft interventions to determine eligibility for use of a proximal or distal embolic protection system. Overall, 483 (77%) of cases had anatomic and lesion characteristics suitable for an embolic protection device, including 59% eligible for proximal protection and 57% for distal protection.
More Related Videos
08:05Occlusion of the Great and Small Saphenous Vein Using Copolymeric Glue Based on N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate and Methacryloxy Sulfolane
Published on: December 9, 2022
07:02A Rabbit Venous Interposition Model Mimicking Revascularization Surgery using Vein Grafts to Assess Intimal Hyperplasia under Arterial Blood Pressure
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction