Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A note on testing in Aalen's additive hazards regression models.

Mouchumi Bhattacharyya¹, John P Klein

¹Mathematics Department, University of Pacific, USA.

Statistics in Medicine

|May 13, 2005

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Pfannenstiel Extraction Site Reduces Postoperative Extraction Site Hernias after Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.

Journal of endourology·2025

Same author

Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Adults With Prone Positioning Using Manual Method Versus Specialty Bed: A Retrospective Comparison Cohort Study.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society·2023

Same author

Impact of High Volume Energy Drink Consumption on Electrocardiographic and Blood Pressure Parameters: A Randomized Trial.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2019

Same author

An exerciSe program to improve depression And sleep Disorders in oncology patients: The SAD study.

European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society·2018

Same author

Cardiovascular responses to ENERGY drinks in a healthy population during eXercise: The C-Energy-X Study.

Journal of electrocardiology·2018

Same author

Electrocardiographic and blood pressure effects of energy drinks and Panax ginseng in healthy volunteers: A randomized clinical trial.

International journal of cardiology·2016

Aalen's additive hazards model offers an alternative for censored data. This study reveals that specific weighting methods in Aalen's approach can lead to inconsistent treatment comparisons, suggesting consistent methods are needed.

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Survival Analysis
Medical Statistics

Background:

Aalen's additive hazards model is an alternative to proportional hazards models for censored data.
This model facilitates weighted comparisons of hazard rates between groups against a baseline.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the consistency of Aalen's suggested weighting method for treatment comparisons in survival analysis.
To identify and propose consistent weighting functions for Aalen's additive hazards model.

Main Methods:

The study analyzes the properties of Aalen's additive hazards regression model.
It contrasts the model's comparison approach with the weighted log-rank test from proportional hazards models.
Inconsistency in Aalen's suggested weighting was demonstrated by varying baseline groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Aalen's suggested weighting function for treatment comparisons can lead to inconsistent test statistics.
The inconsistency arises because the test statistic depends on the choice of the baseline group.
Consistent tests are achieved by employing common weight functions across all comparisons.

Conclusions:

The choice of baseline group significantly impacts the results when using Aalen's suggested weights.
Consistent and reliable treatment effect estimation requires using uniform weight functions.
Recommendations are provided for selecting appropriate weight functions for robust survival data analysis.