Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Chris James1, Guy Carrin, William Savedoff

  • 1Department of Health System Financing, Expenditure and Resource Allocation, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. jamesc@who.int

Health Care Analysis : HCA : Journal of Health Philosophy and Policy
|May 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thailand's health financing resilience during COVID-19: leveraging universal health coverage to tackle the pandemic.

Health economics review·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of a blended in-person and online parenting programme in reducing violence against children in rural Thailand: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia·2026
Same author

Costs and Budget Impact of Scaling-Up Parenting for Lifelong Health for Young Children Program in Thailand.

Child: care, health and development·2025
Same author

Financing and purchasing mechanisms of primary health care in Southeast Asia region: Findings from a scoping review.

SSM - health systems·2025
Same author

Maintaining essential health services during COVID-19: cross-country lessons of health system resilience from Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.

BMJ global health·2025
Same author

Financing policies to sustain improved prevention, control, and management of non-communicable diseases and mental health conditions.

The Lancet. Global health·2025

Developing countries often misallocate health funds to low-impact services benefiting the wealthy. This study proposes using defined criteria for rational health intervention prioritization, considering efficiency and equity trade-offs.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Health Policy

Background:

  • Health expenditures in developing nations frequently lack impact and equity.
  • Resource allocation often follows historical patterns and vested interests, perpetuating inefficiencies.
  • A need exists for systematic approaches to health priority setting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore rationalization of health intervention prioritization in developing countries.
  • To examine key efficiency and equity criteria for resource allocation.
  • To analyze the incorporation of trade-offs in decision-making processes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of health expenditure patterns in developing countries.
  • Examination of efficiency and equity criteria for health interventions.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of decision-making frameworks for health resource allocation.

    • Main Results:

    • Current health spending often yields low overall health impact.
    • Disproportionate benefits accrue to wealthier populations.
    • Prioritization based on defined criteria can improve resource allocation.

    Conclusions:

    • Rational health priority setting is crucial for developing countries.
    • Integrating efficiency and equity criteria can optimize health outcomes.
    • Explicit consideration of trade-offs is necessary for effective resource allocation.