Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026
05:22
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Enduring consequences of experimentally induced biases in interpretation
Jenny Yiend1, Bundy Mackintosh, Andrew Mathews
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, UK. jenny.yiend@psychiatry.oxford.ac.uk
Behaviour Research and Therapy
|May 14, 2005
Summary
Training can bias how people interpret ambiguous text, with effects lasting up to a day. These induced biases may mimic clinical observations in emotional interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Experimental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Training can induce interpretation biases for ambiguous stimuli.
- Previous studies show congruent effects for negative or positive interpretation training.
- Recognition ratings for disambiguating sentences indicate training-congruent effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the durability of induced interpretation biases over time.
- To determine if training effects persist for up to 1 day.
- To assess the potential of induced biases as a clinical analogue.
Main Methods:
- Participants underwent training to interpret emotionally ambiguous passages in a specific direction (positive or negative).
- Novel ambiguous passages were presented after training.
- Recognition ratings for disambiguating sentences were collected to assess interpretation bias.
Main Results:
- Induced interpretation biases were found to be robust and durable.
- Training effects persisted for time spans of up to 1 day.
- Participants showed consistent training-congruent interpretation of new ambiguous material.
Conclusions:
- Induced interpretation biases are durable over extended periods (up to 1 day).
- These findings support the utility of induced biases as a model for clinical observations.
- The study highlights the malleability of interpretation and the persistence of learned biases.
Related Concept Videos
01:53Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
01:31Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
01:12Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
01:17Correspondence Bias
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
01:09First Impression
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...