Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ten myths about decision-making capacity.

Linda Ganzini1, Ladislav Volicer, William A Nelson

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
|May 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Understanding patient decision-making capacity is crucial for ethical healthcare. This article debunks 10 common myths about assessing capacity, aiming to improve clinical practice and protect patient autonomy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'The Play's the Thing' Among Other Innovations: The Establishment of the Medical College of Wisconsin's Medical Humanities Program and Its Incorporation of Medical Humanities Into Medical Education.

WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin·2026
Same author

The Implications of Private Equity Investment in Emergency Medicine.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2026
Same author

Generation cycles in experimental populations of a multivoltine insect.

The Journal of animal ecology·2026
Same author

Decades of historical outbreak cycles in a multivoltine insect reveal a plastic phenological response to climate change.

Ecology·2025
Same author

Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

Should physicians be facilitating gestational carrier arrangements in the absence of medical indication?

Fertility and sterility·2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Patient role in healthcare decisions hinges on clinician assessment of decision-making capacity.
  • Accurate capacity assessment is an ethical obligation for clinicians.
  • Misconceptions about capacity can lead to errors in clinical judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide clinicians with practical information on decision-making capacity assessment.
  • To identify and debunk common myths regarding patient decision-making capacity.
  • To prevent errors in capacity assessment and support patient rights.

Main Methods:

  • Based on a report by the National Ethics Committee (NEC) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
  • Identified 10 common myths about decision-making capacity held by clinicians.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A study of clinicians and ethics committee chairs informed the myth identification.

    • Main Results:

    • Ten prevalent myths about decision-making capacity were identified and are described.
    • Myths include equating capacity with competency, assuming lack of capacity when patients refuse advice, and viewing capacity as absolute.
    • Other myths addressed cognitive impairment, permanence, information provision, psychiatric disorders, involuntary commitment, and assessment expertise.

    Conclusions:

    • Debunking misconceptions can prevent errors in clinical capacity assessment.
    • Accurate assessment supports patients' fundamental right to make informed healthcare choices.
    • Promoting a clearer understanding of decision-making capacity enhances ethical patient care.