Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Assessment of global left ventricular function: comparison of cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography with
Walter Hundt1, Karen Siebert, Bernd J Wintersperger
1Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. walter.hundt@web.de
Insights
Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multidetector row CT (MDCT) can assess left ventricular function. The 3D method shows the highest correlation with invasive ventriculography, but significantly overestimates end-systolic volumes, underestimating stroke volume and ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Radiology
Background:
- Assessing left ventricular (LV) function is crucial for diagnosing and managing cardiovascular diseases.
- Invasive ventriculography (LVG) is a standard method for evaluating LV function, but it is invasive.
- Non-invasive imaging techniques like ECG-gated MDCT offer a potential alternative for LV function assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of three different volumetric assessment methods using ECG-gated MDCT for determining left ventricular function.
- To compare the MDCT-derived volumetric data with measurements obtained from invasive left ventriculography.
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent ECG-gated MDCT coronary angiography.
- Left ventricular volumes were calculated using three methods: 3D dataset, hemisphere cylinder (HC), and biplane ellipsoid (BE).
- Calculated end-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), stroke volumes (SV), and ejection fractions (EF) were compared to LVG measurements.
Main Results:
- The 3D method demonstrated good correlation with LVG for EDV (r=0.73), ESV (r=0.88), and EF (r=0.76).
- While EDV measurements did not differ significantly, the 3D method showed significant overestimation of ESV (P<0.01), leading to underestimation of SV and EF (P<0.01).
- The HC method resulted in the most substantial overestimation of LV volumes compared to LVG.
Conclusions:
- ECG-gated MDCT can be used to calculate left ventricular volumes and estimate systolic function.
- The 3D volumetric method shows the highest correlation with invasive ventriculography.
- Significant overestimation of ESV by MDCT necessitates caution when interpreting SV and EF values.
Objective:
Evaluation of left ventricular function using electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated multidetector row CT (MDCT) by using 3 different volumetric assessment methods in comparison to assessment of the left ventricular function by invasive ventriculography.
Methods:
Thirty patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease underwent MDCT coronary angiography with retrospective ECG cardiac gating. Raw data were reconstructed at the end-diastolic and end-systolic periods of the heart cycle. To calculate the volumes of the left ventricle, 3 methods were applied: The 3-dimensional data set (3D), the geometric hemisphere cylinder (HC), and the geometric biplane ellipsoid (BE) methods. End-diastolic volumes (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV), the stroke volumes (SV), and ejection fractions (EF) were calculated. The left ventricular volumetric data from the 3 methods were compared with measurements from left ventriculography (LVG).
Results:
The best results were obtained using the 3D method; EDV (r = 0.73), ESV (r = 0.88), and EF (r = 0.76) correlated well with the LVG data. The EDV volumes did not differ significantly between LVG and the 3D method (P = 0.24); however, ESV, SV, and EF differed significantly. The ESV were significantly overestimated (P < 0.01), leading to an underestimation of the SV (P < 0.01) and the EF (P < 0.01). The HC method resulted in the greatest overestimation of the volumes. The EDV and the ESV were 31.8 +/- 37.6% and 136.4 +/- 92.9% higher than the EDV and ESV volumes obtained by LVG. Bland-Altman analysis showed systematic overestimation of the ESV using the HC method.
Conclusion:
MDCT with retrospective cardiac ECG gating allows the calculation of left ventricular volumes to estimate systolic function. The 3D method had the highest correlation with LVG. However, the overestimation of the ESV is significant, which led to an underestimation of the SV and the EF.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion, evaluates...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

