Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Rapid High Throughput Amylose Determination in Freeze Dried Potato Tuber Samples
Published on: October 14, 2013
Potato tuber isoapyrases: substrate specificity, affinity labeling, and proteolytic susceptibility
A M Kettlun1, V Espinosa, L García
1Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 233, Correo 1, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract:
Apyrase/ATP-diphosphohydrolase hydrolyzes di- and triphosphorylated nucleosides in the presence of a bivalent ion with sequential release of orthophosphate. We performed studies of substrate specificity on homogeneous isoapyrases from two potato tuber clonal varieties: Desiree (low ATPase/ADPase ratio) and Pimpernel (high ATPase/ADPase ratio) by measuring the kinetic parameters K(m) and k(cat) on deoxyribonucleotides and fluorescent analogues of ATP and ADP. Both isoapyrases showed a broad specificity towards dATP, dGTP, dTTP, dCTP, thio-dATP, fluorescent nucleotides (MANT-; TNP-; ethene-derivatives of ATP and ADP). The hydrolytic activity on the triphosphorylated compounds was always higher for the Pimpernel apyrase. Modifications either on the base or the ribose moieties did not increase K(m) values, suggesting that the introduction of large groups (MANT- and TNP-) in the ribose does not produce steric hindrance on substrate binding. However, the presence of these bulky groups caused, in general, a reduction in k(cat), indicating an important effect on the catalytic step. Substantial differences were observed between potato apyrases and enzymes from various animal tissues, concerning affinity labeling with azido-nucleotides and FSBA (5'-p-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl adenosine). PLP-nucleotide derivatives were unable to produce inactivation of potato apyrase. The lack of sensitivity of both potato enzymes towards these nucleotide analogues rules out the proximity or adequate orientation of sulfhydryl, hydroxyl or amino-groups to the modifying groups. Both apyrases were different in the proteolytic susceptibility towards trypsin, chymotrypsin and Glu-C.
More Related Videos
09:47The Determination of Protease Specificity in Mouse Tissue Extracts by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Manipulating PH to Cause Specificity Changes
Published on: May 25, 2018
09:07Concanavalin A-Based Sedimentation Assay to Measure Substrate Binding of Glucan Phosphatases
Published on: December 23, 2022