Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Penis reconstruction using three different operative methods.

Z Q Hu1, H Hyakusoku, J H Gao

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, 1838 GuangZhou Road, GuangZhou 510515, China. doctorhzq@hotmail.com

British Journal of Plastic Surgery
|May 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Current situation and consideration for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication therapy in special populations].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2026
Same author

[Evaluation of the embryonic developmental toxicity of 3, 4-dinitrofurazanfuroxan using embryonic stem cell test model].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2026
Same author

[Subacute toxicity study of triethylenediammonium perchlorate ammonium complex salt in rats].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2025
Same author

[Effects of simulated gas of thermobaric bomb charge explosion on Tau protein phosphorylation and cognitive function in rats].

Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases·2024
Same author

Influence of Surface Pretreatment on the Bond Strength of a Resin Luting Cement to Saliva-contaminated Enamel and Dentin.

Operative dentistry·2024
Same author

Comparing Various Resin Luting Cement Systems in Different Etching Modes Through Bond Durability and Morphological Features.

Operative dentistry·2024
Same journal

British West Indies peregrinations.

British journal of plastic surgery·2010
Same journal

Ten-year review of hypospadias surgery from a single centre.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Anatomical study of the cutaneous perforator arteries and vascularisation of the biceps femoris muscle.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Reconstruction of intraoral defects using facial artery musculomucosal flap.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

The distal medial perforators of the lower leg and their accompanying veins.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Acute exacerbation of macroglossia.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
See all related articles

For penile reconstruction, paraumbilical island flaps and free forearm flaps offer 100% success rates. Lower abdominal pedicled fascia flaps are less suitable, with only a 50% survival rate in reconstructions.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Penile reconstruction is a complex procedure aiming to restore function and aesthetics.
  • Evaluating the success rates of different surgical techniques is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the success rates, including aesthetic outcomes, of three distinct penile reconstruction techniques.
  • To determine the most effective methods for penile defect repair.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 44 penile reconstruction cases over 12 years.
  • Analysis of three surgical techniques: lower abdominal pedicled fascia flaps, paraumbilical island flaps, and free forearm flaps.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Lower abdominal pedicled fascia flaps had a 50% survival rate.
  • Paraumbilical island flaps and free forearm flaps achieved 100% success rates.
  • Paraumbilical island flaps offer a simpler procedure without microsurgery, while free forearm flaps provide superior shape but require microsurgical expertise.

    • Conclusions:

    • Paraumbilical island flaps and free forearm flaps are the preferred methods for penile reconstruction.
    • Lower abdominal pedicled fascia flaps are associated with lower success rates and should be used sparingly.