Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Soft tissue sarcomas: are current referral guidelines sufficient?

R Hussein1, M A Smith

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
|May 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Myxofibrosarcoma. Clinicopathologic analysis of 75 cases with emphasis on the low-grade variant.

The American journal of surgical pathology·1996
Same author

Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis.

JAMA·1996
Same author

Contaminated stethoscopes revisited.

Archives of internal medicine·1996
Same author

beta PP and Tau interaction. A possible link between amyloid and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease.

The American journal of pathology·1996
Same author

Effects of stress on neurotrophic factor expression in the rat brain.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1995
Same author

Evidence for oxidative stress in Pick disease and corticobasal degeneration.

Brain research·1995

Current guidelines for soft tissue sarcomas are inadequate, leading to delays in specialist care. Early referral protocols need revision, emphasizing tumor depth, size, and growth rate for faster patient evaluation.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Early referral guidelines for extremity soft tissue sarcomas are under scrutiny.
  • Assessing the effectiveness of current referral criteria is crucial for timely patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adequacy of existing early referral guidelines for extremity soft tissue sarcomas.
  • To identify areas for improvement in the referral process for soft tissue tumors.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective evaluation of 365 patients with confirmed soft tissue sarcomas.
  • Data collection included symptom duration and guideline-specific features (pain, growth rate, depth, size).
  • Statistical analysis employed t-tests, ANOVA, and Chi-squared tests.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Deep tumors were most common (306 patients), while pain was the least consistent feature (176 patients).
  • 345 patients with guideline-suggestive features experienced an average delay of 19.86 months, with 238 referred after 3 months.
  • Tumor depth was the most sensitive indicator, followed by size and rapid growth history.

Conclusions:

  • Despite meeting referral criteria, patients faced unacceptable delays in specialist care.
  • Referral guidelines require modification, prioritizing tumor depth, size, and rapid growth.
  • Increased awareness and accessible specialist clinics are recommended for prompt soft tissue tumor evaluation.