Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization.

Yukako Yagi1, John R Gilbertson

  • 1University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, USA. yagi@imap.pitt.edu

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
|May 20, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three-dimensional high-content imaging of unstained soft tissue with subcellular resolution using a laboratory-based X-ray microscope.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Micro-Computed Tomography Based Whole Block Imaging of Asthma-Associated Airway Remodeling With Mycobacterium avium-Induced Cavity Formation: 3-Dimensional Nondestructive Analysis.

Pathology international·2025
Same author

New standards in HER2-low testing: the CASI-01 comparative methods study.

EBioMedicine·2025
Same author

Three-dimensional high-content imaging of unstained soft tissue with subcellular resolution using a laboratory-based multi-modal X-ray microscope.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Optimization of Scanning Protocol for AI-Integrated Assessment of HER2 Dual Bright-Field In-Situ Hybridization Application in Breast Cancer.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Exposed embolization coils left in situ after embolization of a pseudoaneurysm inside walled-off pancreatic necrosis and subsequent successful direct endoscopic necrosectomy.

Endoscopy·2025
Same journal

Experiences of patient-led melanoma surveillance and teledermatology in underserved groups in the Melanoma Self-Surveillance Trial: A qualitative sub-study.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same journal

Investigation of the validity and reliability of tele-assessment of upper extremity functions in individuals with stroke.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same journal

A systematic review and meta-synthesis examining the relationship between virtual communication and mental health outcomes of family members of intensive care unit patients.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same journal

Embodied care at a distance: How virtual consultations reshape bodily presence and trust in cancer rehabilitation in women with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same journal

Can digital navigators help reduce inequities in healthcare? A systematic review.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
Same journal

Addressing high-utilizers of virtual urgent care through an EHR clinical decision support nudge.

Journal of telemedicine and telecare·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing digital pathology imaging is complex, involving multiple steps from sample prep to display. Developing objective quality evaluation and correction mechanisms is crucial for reliable pathology image standards.

Area of Science:

  • Digital Pathology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Histotechnology

Background:

  • Digital imaging in microscopy involves numerous sequential operations.
  • Each step, including sample preparation, optical formation, digital sampling, and display, impacts final image quality.
  • While individual steps are understood, the entire digital imaging process is difficult to standardize.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline key concepts for establishing robust digital pathology imaging standards.
  • To address challenges in standardizing the complete digital imaging workflow.
  • To ensure digital images are diagnostically useful for pathologists.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on digital imaging processes and pathology imaging standards.
  • Analysis of critical components for standardization: file sharing, color/display parameters, diagnostic utility, quality evaluation, and error correction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of the need for a supporting public organization.

    • Main Results:

    • Key concepts for pathology imaging standards include:
    • Interoperable file sharing and transmission of baseline color/display parameters.
    • Ensuring diagnostic utility comparable to direct microscopy.
    • Developing objective image quality evaluation and tissue processing error correction mechanisms.
    • The necessity of a public organization to support pathologists in standard development.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardizing digital pathology imaging requires a multi-faceted approach addressing technical and practical aspects.
    • Objective quality assessment and error correction are vital for reliable digital pathology.
    • Collaborative efforts, supported by public organizations, are essential for advancing pathology imaging standards.