Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Image-Guided Resection of Glioblastoma and Intracranial Implantation of Therapeutic Stem Cell-seeded Scaffolds
Published on: July 16, 2018
Impact of intraoperative MRI on the surgical results for high-grade gliomas
H Hirschberg1, E Samset, P K Hol
1Department of Neurosurgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. hirschberg@laser.bli.uci.edu
Objective:
The impact of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) on the surgical procedure, patient outcome and median survival for a series of patients harbouring high-grade gliomas forms the basis of this study. Their outcome has been compared to a matched cohort of patients operated in a conventional manner to determine if the use of intraoperative MRI can be shown to improve the results of surgery and prognosis for this type of patient.
Materials And Methods:
32 microsurgical open craniotomies, performed in the intraoperative iMRI scanner for grade IV supratentorial gliomas, with follow-up periods of more than 2 months, were analyzed for this study. A group of 32 primary high-grade glioma patients (no recurrent tumors) were matched for age, preoperative clinical grade, gender and histology and operated during a corresponding time interval in a conventional manner acted as controls.
Results:
All 64 patients were examined and analyzed for the occurrence of postoperative increased neurological morbidity or death. No complications directly related to the intraoperative scanning procedures were observed and no intraoperative death occurred in either group. The average operating time in the intraoperative scanner was 5.1 hours and was significantly longer than in the conventional OR (3.4 hours). The mean overall survival time for the 32 patients in the study group was 14.5 months (95 % confidence interval 12.0 - 16.6) compared to 12.1 months (95 % confidence interval 10.2 - 14.1) for the matched control group.
Conclusion:
Although iMRI is an effective way of imaging residual tumor, this study could not demonstrate an increased efficacy of surgery utilizing this technique for patients harbouring grade IV gliomas compared to more conventional methods. No statistical significance was noted between the two groups (p = 0.14). The complication rate was within the range reported for other series, in both control as well as the study group.
Insights
Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) did not significantly improve surgical outcomes or survival for high-grade glioma patients compared to conventional surgery. While effective for imaging, iMRI did not demonstrate superior efficacy in this study.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- High-grade gliomas are aggressive brain tumors requiring advanced surgical techniques.
- Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) offers real-time imaging during surgery to potentially improve tumor resection.
- Assessing the impact of iMRI on surgical outcomes and patient prognosis is crucial for treatment optimization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in improving surgical outcomes and median survival for patients with high-grade gliomas.
- To compare the results of surgery and prognosis in patients undergoing iMRI-assisted surgery versus conventional surgery.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 32 patients with grade IV supratentorial gliomas underwent surgery with intraoperative MRI (iMRI).
- A control group of 32 matched patients with primary high-grade gliomas were operated using conventional methods.
- Outcomes, including neurological morbidity, mortality, operating time, and survival, were analyzed for both groups.
Main Results:
- No direct complications or intraoperative deaths were observed in the iMRI group.
- Average operating time was longer in the iMRI group (5.1 hours) compared to the conventional group (3.4 hours).
- Mean survival was 14.5 months for the iMRI group versus 12.1 months for the conventional group, a difference that was not statistically significant (p = 0.14).
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is effective for visualizing residual tumor during surgery for high-grade gliomas.
- This study did not find statistically significant evidence that iMRI improves surgical efficacy or patient prognosis compared to conventional surgical methods.
- The complication rates were comparable between the iMRI and conventional surgery groups.

