Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic literature reviews.

Adrian White1, Katja Schmidt

  • 1Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Institute of Health and Social Care, ITTC Building, Tamar Science Park, Plymouth PL6 8BX, UK. adrian.white@pms.ac.uk

Complementary Therapies in Medicine
|May 24, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stress-induced ribosome degradation in Bacillus subtilis is mediated by the RNase Y-specificity complex.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Ecotoxicological effects of deep-sea sediments from polymetallic nodule fields in the marine mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Insights into spacer acquisition of the type V-A CRISPR-Cas system of Francisella novicida U112.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Persistence, spillover, and evolution of co-occurring lineages of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus.

Virus evolution·2025
Same author

A survey on the implementation of environmental health monitoring in mouse facilities in German-speaking countries.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Multiplex serology for Streptobacillus moniliformis and other 'rat bite fever-like' microorganisms for seroprevalence studies in rodents.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Wearable device-telemonitored Baduanjin for chronic heart failure: A systematic review of effects on exercise tolerance and cardiac function.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
Same journal

Effects of laughter therapy in patients with cancer: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
Same journal

Impact of physical exercise interventions on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
Same journal

Effects of traditional Chinese exercises on sleep quality among post-stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
Same journal

Effect of head and facial massage combined with aromatherapy on sleep quality and delirium in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A randomized controlled trial.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
Same journal

Cognitive improvement by daily intake of coffee cherry pulp extract from Coffea canephora var. Robusta in a Japanese population: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial.

Complementary therapies in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews synthesize health evidence to minimize bias. Following a defined protocol ensures reliable summaries for guiding healthcare decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Health research methodology
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are crucial for synthesizing available evidence on specific health questions.
  • Minimizing reviewer bias is a key design principle of systematic reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential steps and considerations for conducting a systematic review.
  • To emphasize the importance of a pre-defined protocol and adequate resources.

Main Methods:

  • Framing a clear research question and selecting appropriate methodologies.
  • Comprehensive literature search to identify relevant studies.
  • Systematic data extraction focusing on outcomes and study quality.
  • Evidence synthesis and interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A well-defined protocol guides the systematic review process, reducing bias.
  • Appropriate resources are necessary before initiating a review.
  • Reviews combining valid, homogeneous studies offer strong evidence for healthcare decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews provide a robust framework for evidence synthesis.
  • Adherence to protocol and methodological rigor enhances the reliability of findings.
  • High-quality systematic reviews are instrumental in informing clinical practice and healthcare policy.