Prostaglandin E2 gel induction of patients with a prior low transverse cesarean section

To determine safety and efficacy of induction with prostaglandin E2 gel, we compared the outcome of 25 patients (study group) with an unfavorable cervix, a medical indication for delivery, and one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section to 56 patients (comparison group) with one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section and spontaneous labor. We placed 1 mg of prostaglandin E2 in gel intracervically in the 25 study patients. Common indications for delivery were: diabetes, post dates, and preeclampsia. Although most labor and delivery variables were similar, the study group had a longer mean latent phase (14.2 +/- 13.8 versus 7.3 +/- 3.7 hours: p less than 0.002), but had a shorter mean length of active phase (4.0 +/- 3.5 versus 5.7 +/- 3.0 hours; p less than 0.02). None of the patients in either group had a dehiscence of the uterine scar, nor rupture of the uterus. Both groups had a similar cesarean section rate. Since from the few reported, nonrandomized studies it appears that prostaglandin E2 gel use in patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section may be useful and relatively safe, it may be time to attempt randomized trials of prostaglandin E2 gel versus oxytocin for induction of patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section, unfavorable cervix, and a medical indication for delivery.