Related Experiment Videos
Peripheral ischemia caused by paradoxical embolization: an underestimated problem?
Beate Hugl1, Peter Klein-Weigel, Lydia Posch
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. beate.hugl@uibk.ac.at
Abstract:
Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is often found in younger patients with transient ischemic attacks or stroke, paradoxical embolization through PFO is rarely considered as a cause of acute limb ischemia. We report a single-center experience of 5 consecutive patients with limb-threatening ischemia due to paradoxical embolization within a one-year period. All patients were treated by catheter thrombectomy and long-term oral anticoagulation after surgery. The fact that the 5 embolectomies made up 10% of all embolectomies performed in our center during this time interval may indicate that the role of paradoxical embolization is still underestimated in peripheral embolic disease.
Insights
Paradoxical embolization through a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an underrecognized cause of acute limb ischemia. This study highlights 5 cases treated with catheter thrombectomy, suggesting PFO
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cardiac anomaly, often asymptomatic.
- PFO is a known risk factor for cryptogenic stroke and transient ischemic attacks.
- Paradoxical embolization via PFO is typically associated with cerebrovascular events, not peripheral ischemia.
Observation:
- This single-center study observed 5 consecutive patients presenting with limb-threatening ischemia over one year.
- These cases were attributed to paradoxical embolization originating from a PFO.
- The incidence represented 10% of all embolectomies performed at the center during the study period.
Findings:
- All 5 patients with acute limb ischemia secondary to paradoxical embolization were successfully treated with catheter thrombectomy.
- Long-term oral anticoagulation was initiated post-procedure for all patients.
- The findings suggest a potentially higher prevalence of PFO-related peripheral emboli than previously recognized.
Implications:
- The role of paradoxical embolization through PFO in acute limb ischemia may be significantly underestimated.
- Increased clinical suspicion for PFO is warranted in patients presenting with peripheral embolic events, especially younger individuals.
- This underscores the importance of considering PFO in the differential diagnosis of unexplained limb ischemia.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology