Do patients' preferences predict smoking cessation?
L C W Wiggers1, P F M Stalmeier, F J Oort
1Department of Medical Psychology (J3-220), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Social cognitive theories (e.g., ASE-model) propose that smoking cessation can be accomplished by changing underlying cognitive determinants such as attitudes, social influence, and self-efficacy. Others have argued that people's preferences for a health state can also predict behavior. In this study, preferences constitute the degree to which one is willing to give up a valuable good, that is survival, to obtain a desirable behavior (e.g., to quit smoking). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of cognitive determinants and patients' preferences on the prediction of smoking cessation.
Methods:
Data were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial. Smoking outpatients (N = 217) with cardiovascular disease were included. At baseline (T0), socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were measured. Social cognitions (pros of quitting, pros of smoking, social influence, and self-efficacy) and preferences (using a paper time trade-off measure (TTO)) were assessed at T1 (1 week). Smoking cessation was assessed at T2 (8 weeks).
Results:
Logistic regression analysis showed that socio-demographic (P = .92) and clinical (P = .26) factors did not predict smoking cessation, whereas social cognitions (P = .02) and preferences did (P = .00). On average, quitters are willing to give up an appreciable amount of survival years in order to quit smoking.
Conclusion:
Preference for quitting was the strongest single predictor of smoking cessation.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Drug Dependence
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy
