Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices.

P Taylor1, R M Given-Wilson

  • 1Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London.

The British Journal of Radiology
|May 27, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publication time for letters. Letters are not published fast enough in the BMJ.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
Same author

Driving simulation performance predicts future accidents among older drivers.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society·1999
Same author

Traumatic rupture of the aortic arch treated by stent grafting.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·1999
Same author

Determinants responsible for assembly of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

The Journal of general physiology·1999
Same author

Crystal structure of mouse acetylcholinesterase. A peripheral site-occluding loop in a tetrameric assembly.

The Journal of biological chemistry·1999
Same author

Nociceptive and antinociceptive responses to intrathecally administered nicotinic agonists.

Neuropharmacology·1999
Same journal

Radioligand therapy for paediatric patients with solid tumours.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Vertebral computed tomography attenuation to case-find low bone density in people undergoing lung cancer screening.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Computer-aided detection (CAD) for mammography did not significantly improve cancer detection rates in three UK studies. While CAD highlighted many missed cancers, its overall impact on radiologist performance requires further investigation.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Mammography is a key tool for breast cancer screening.
  • Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems aim to assist radiologists in interpreting mammograms.
  • Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of CAD in clinical practice is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review three major UK studies on the impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography.
  • To assess the effect of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers.
  • To explore the challenges and merits of research in CAD for mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Two retrospective studies evaluated CAD's impact on film reader sensitivity and specificity using known outcomes.
  • A prospective study assessed CAD's effect on cancer detection rates through independent double readings before and after CAD prompts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of cancer detection rates with and without CAD assistance was performed.

    • Main Results:

    • None of the three studies demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in cancer detection attributable to CAD.
    • Evidence suggests CAD prompts identify a high proportion of missed cancers.
    • "Emphasised" CAD prompts, with higher positive predictive value, showed a stronger influence on reader decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Current CAD systems for mammography have not shown a statistically significant benefit in improving cancer detection rates in the reviewed UK studies.
    • The effectiveness of CAD may depend on the type of prompts and their positive predictive value.
    • Further research is needed to understand the optimal implementation and impact of CAD in mammography screening programs.