Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance evaluation, part 1: definitions and criteria.

Robert E Gregg1

  • 1Boardman Law Firm, 1 South Pinckney Street, P.O. Box 927, Madison, WI 53701-0927, USA. rgregg@boardmanlawfirm

The Journal of Medical Practice Management : MPM
|June 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This article reviews employee performance evaluation, defining validity based on legal standards. It details objective criteria for effective employee ratings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Blundering into Liability: Unwitting Creation of Employment Contracts.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2018
Same author

It was just a joke: improper comments and practice liability.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2013
Same author

Use or abuse of computers in the workplace.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2007
Same author

Light-duty jobs and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2007
Same author

Consumers challenge accessibility under the ADA.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2006
Same author

Validity in the hiring and evaluation process.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2006

Area of Science:

  • Management Science
  • Legal Studies

Background:

  • Performance evaluation is a critical management function.
  • Ensuring fairness and accuracy in evaluations is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of performance evaluation.
  • To define the legal standard of validity in employee appraisals.
  • To outline objective criteria for effective employee rating.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of performance evaluation concepts.
  • Analysis of legal precedents defining validity.
  • Synthesis of best practices for objective employee rating.

Main Results:

  • Performance evaluation is a multifaceted process.
  • Validity in evaluations is legally defined by court decisions.
  • Objective criteria are crucial for fair and defensible employee ratings.

Conclusions:

  • Managers must adhere to objective criteria for valid performance evaluations.
  • Understanding the legal definition of validity enhances appraisal processes.
  • This article serves as a foundational guide for effective employee appraisal.

Related Experiment Videos