Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Alberto de Hoyos1, Virginia R Litle, James D Luketich

  • 1Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery and the Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Presbyterian, Suite C-800, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|June 2, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robotic Transhiatal Revision of Gastric Conduit After Esophagectomy: Experience in 15 Patients.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2026
Same author

Feasibility and Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intrathoracic Chemoperfusion for Pleural Mesothelioma.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Regional characteristics of esophageal cancer and robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): an analysis of the international UGIRA registry.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2026
Same author

Minimally invasive surgical management of mid- to distal esophageal diverticula: a large single-center review.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract·2026
Same author

Robotic transhiatal revision of gastric conduit after esophagectomy: A technical overview.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same author

Reply: Molecular prognostication, response validation, and bronchoscopic intervention: The next frontiers of radiofrequency ablation.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Scalpel's Reach.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Society.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Hospitals.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions for Providers.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Patients Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is safe in specialized centers, offering faster recovery. However, high costs and a steep learning curve remain challenges for this advanced surgical technique.

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Esophagectomy is a critical procedure for esophageal diseases.
  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an evolving alternative to open surgery.
  • Specialized centers are key to evaluating MIE's safety and efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the safety and potential benefits of MIE.
  • To identify the drawbacks associated with MIE.
  • To compare MIE with conventional open esophagectomy approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy procedures in specialized centers.
  • Analysis of potential benefits such as reduced hospital stay and faster recovery.
  • Evaluation of drawbacks including instrumentation costs and surgical learning curve.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • MIE can be safely performed in selected patients at expert centers.
  • Potential benefits include decreased hospital stay and quicker return to activity.
  • Drawbacks involve high disposable instrument costs and a significant learning curve for surgeons.

Conclusions:

  • MIE is a viable option in specialized settings, with promising recovery benefits.
  • Further prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm MIE's advantages.
  • Open esophagectomy remains the standard approach in most institutions currently.