Related Experiment Videos

The social competence of very-low-birthweight children: teacher, peer, and self-perceptions

E A Hoy1, D H Sykes, J M Bill

  • 1School of Psychology, Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Insights

Very-low birthweight (VLBW) children show poorer social competence than normal birthweight (NBW) children. VLBW children reported higher sadness and social withdrawal, with lower social skills and peer acceptance.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Pediatrics
  • Social-Emotional Learning

Background:

  • Social competence in children born with very-low birthweight (VLBW) is understudied compared to intellectual outcomes.
  • Understanding social differences is crucial for targeted interventions and support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the social competence of school-aged very-low birthweight (VLBW) children with normal birthweight (NBW) children.
  • To investigate differences in social maladjustment, social skill, and peer acceptance between VLBW and NBW groups.

Main Methods:

  • A matched-pairs study comparing 183 VLBW children with 183 NBW children.
  • Utilized multi-informant (teacher, peer, self) ratings for social competence assessment.
  • Assessed social maladjustment, social skill, and peer acceptance across different social classes.

Main Results:

  • VLBW children exhibited significantly higher sadness/unhappiness scores than NBW children, even when controlling for IQ.
  • The VLBW group showed increased social withdrawal.
  • VLBW children had lower scores for social skill and peer acceptance compared to NBW children.

Conclusions:

  • VLBW children face social-emotional challenges impacting their school-age adjustment.
  • These findings highlight the need to consider social competence in the developmental trajectory of VLBW individuals.
  • Further research into antecedents and consequences of these social differences is warranted.

Related Concept Videos