Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations.

S M Kosslyn1, C F Chabris, C J Marsolek

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Receptive field characteristics that allow parietal lobe neurons to encode spatial properties of visual input: a computational analysis.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Visual Mental Imagery Activates Topographically Organized Visual Cortex: PET Investigations.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Individual differences in cerebral blood flow in area 17 predict the time to evaluate visualized letters.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Is cognitive neuropsychology plausible? The perils of sitting on a one-legged stool.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Why are "What" and "Where" Processed by Separate Cortical Visual Systems? A Computational Investigation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Separable mechanisms in face processing: evidence from hemispheric specialization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Neural network simulations differentiate categorical and coordinate spatial representations. Findings suggest distinct computational mechanisms and neural substrates for these spatial processing types, aligning with human cognitive studies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Human spatial cognition involves distinct categorical and coordinate representations.
  • Previous research suggests potential differences in neural processing for these spatial relation types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the computational distinctions between categorical and coordinate spatial representations using neural network simulations.
  • To explore how network architecture and stimulus properties influence these representations.

Main Methods:

  • Four sets of neural network simulations were conducted.
  • Networks were manipulated in terms of unit splitting, discrimination difficulty, receptive field size, and stimulus contrast.
  • Performance on categorical and coordinate spatial judgment tasks was evaluated.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Split networks excelled at distinguishing between categorical and coordinate judgments, while unsplit networks performed better on two coordinate judgments.
  • Increased discrimination difficulty similarly impacted both network types, mirroring human performance.
  • Large, overlapping receptive fields benefited coordinate tasks, whereas small, non-overlapping fields aided categorical tasks.
  • Stimulus contrast influenced hemispheric asymmetry, potentially due to neuronal input levels.

Conclusions:

  • Neural network simulations provide evidence for distinct computational mechanisms underlying categorical and coordinate spatial representations.
  • Network architecture, particularly receptive field properties, may underlie observed cerebral lateralization in spatial processing.
  • Simulation results align with and offer explanations for human behavioral and neuroimaging findings in spatial cognition.