Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.

M Zankl1, U Fill, C Hoeschen

  • 1GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, 85758 Neuherberg, Germany. zankl@gsf.de

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|June 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality assurance for the use of computational methods in dosimetry: activities of EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry'.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same author

ICRP Publication 145: Adult Mesh-Type Reference Computational Phantoms.

Annals of the ICRP·2020
Same author

ICRP Publication 143: Paediatric Reference Computational Phantoms.

Annals of the ICRP·2020
Same author

An intense source for cold cluster ions of a specific composition.

The Review of scientific instruments·2020
Same author

[Use of artificial intelligence for image reconstruction].

Der Radiologe·2020
Same author

EURAMED's vision on medical radiation protection (research).

Annals of the ICRP·2018
Same journal

LIST OF REVIEWERS FOR 2025.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Development of CaSO4: Dy-based ring badge for extremity dose monitoring of radiation workers in India.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Activity concentration of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil around the Belarusian nuclear power plant in the pre-commissioning period.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

Accurate mammography dosimetry requires considering glandular tissue distribution, not just average composition. Local tissue variations significantly impact radiation dose calculations, revealing a key challenge in patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiological Dosimetry
  • Biomedical Imaging

Background:

  • Mammography relies on accurate radiation dose assessment for patient safety.
  • Current dosimetry models often assume homogeneous tissue composition, which may not reflect real breast anatomy.
  • Understanding glandular tissue distribution is crucial for precise dose calculations in mammography.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To calculate tissue dose conversion coefficients for realistic breast voxel models.
  • To compare Monte Carlo-derived dose coefficients with existing literature values.
  • To investigate the impact of glandular tissue distribution on mammography dosimetry.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 8 compressed breast voxel models (4-7 cm thickness) derived from high-resolution CT data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed Monte Carlo simulations to calculate tissue dose conversion coefficients for 14 mammographic radiation qualities.
  • Compared results with literature values derived from homogeneous breast models.
  • Main Results:

    • Calculated dose conversion coefficients showed good agreement with literature when glandular tissue was concentrated superiorly.
    • Coefficients were up to 40% lower than literature values when glandular tissue was concentrated inferiorly.
    • Demonstrated significant influence of local glandular tissue distribution on dose calculations.

    Conclusions:

    • Breast thickness alone is insufficient for accurate mammography patient dosimetry.
    • The local, non-uniform distribution of glandular tissue significantly affects glandular dose.
    • A fundamental challenge exists in patient dosimetry due to unknown glandular tissue heterogeneity.