Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Testing simple indices of habitat proximity.

Rachael Winfree1, Jonathan Dushoff, Elizabeth E Crone

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA. rwinfree@princeton.edu

The American Naturalist
|June 7, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serial Interval and Intervention Efficiency in Pertussis Outbreak, South Korea, 2024.

Emerging infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Bumble bee species display contrasting phenological responses to climate variation.

Ecology·2026
Same author

Floral microbes provisioned by Osmia lignaria establish in larval food stores, but do not affect bee development or survival.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2026
Same author

Separating Sampling Bias From Abundance Shows That Different Methods Catch Different Wild Bees.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Interpreting Breakthrough Infections Given Assortative Mixing of Partially Vaccinated Populations.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Genome assemblies of two bumble bee species: Bombus sonorus and Bombus vosnesenskii.

The Journal of heredity·2025
Same journal

Traffic Reduction during COVID-19 Lockdowns Benefited Species Already Tolerant of Noise Pollution: An Acoustic Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

On Pachycephalosaurs, Trade-Offs, and the Historical Genesis of Sociosexual Display Structures.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Structured Landscapes Promote Persistence by Favoring Prudent Predators.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Can Carbon Economy Explain Leaf Dynamic Seasonality in a Tropical Seasonal Rainforest?

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same journal

Seminal Fluid Proteins as Regulation Factors for Optimizing Reproduction: A Modeling Approach.

The American naturalist·2026
See all related articles

Simple habitat proximity indices, often based on land cover, are commonly used but poorly predict animal movement. Even indices considering habitat area and distance failed to accurately forecast population responses in this study.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Conservation Biology
  • Spatial Ecology

Background:

  • Habitat proximity indices based on land cover are frequently used to estimate habitat connectivity and animal movement potential.
  • These indices are often employed without rigorous testing against empirical animal movement data or detailed ecological models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various habitat proximity indices in predicting population-level responses.
  • To test a priori hypotheses regarding the suitability of different indices for specific study systems and organisms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a priori expectations for habitat proximity index performance.
  • Tested multiple habitat proximity indices using data from three distinct study systems and four different species.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the correlation between different indices and their predictive power for population response variables.

    • Main Results:

    • A priori expectations about index performance were not supported by the data.
    • Indices incorporating both habitat area and distance were highly correlated, indicating they measure similar ecological properties.
    • None of the tested habitat proximity indices effectively predicted population-level response variables.

    Conclusions:

    • Simple land cover-based habitat proximity indices may be insufficient for accurately predicting animal movement processes.
    • Further research is needed to develop more robust methods for assessing habitat connectivity and its impact on animal populations.