Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Oral antihyperglycemic agents and renal disease: new agents, new concepts
1Metabolic Day Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. jean-francois.yale@mcgill.ca
Abstract:
The results of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and UK Prospective Diabetes Study trials in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively, have proved the importance of intensive glucose management in the prevention of microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy). Both trials showed encouraging trends for a decrease in macrovascular complications, and this is being pursued in new studies. These findings have led to more strict goals for glucose control. As glucose levels are aimed to be closer to the normal range, the risk for hypoglycemia also increases dramatically. The choice of the agent therefore is more influenced currently by the risk for hypoglycemia. There are presently four classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents. These agents differ greatly in terms of mechanisms of action, efficacy, side effect profiles, and cost. Except for Acarbose, all classes decrease the glycosylated hemoglobin by a similar magnitude: 1.0 to 1.5%. In chronic renal failure, the oral agents that can be used therefore include the insulin secretagogues repaglinide and nateglinide and the thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) with caution. Insulin also can be used safely in renal failure.
Insights
Intensive glucose control prevents diabetes complications but increases hypoglycemia risk. Oral agents vary in efficacy and side effects, influencing treatment choices, especially in renal failure.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Metabolic Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Intensive glucose management is crucial for preventing microvascular complications in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as shown by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and UK Prospective Diabetes Study.
- Stricter glucose control goals, driven by these trials, increase the risk of hypoglycemia.
- The choice of antihyperglycemic agents is now significantly influenced by hypoglycemia risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the role of oral antihyperglycemic agents in diabetes management.
- To compare the efficacy, side effect profiles, and costs of different oral antihyperglycemic classes.
- To discuss the use of oral agents and insulin in patients with chronic renal failure.
Main Methods:
- Review of findings from major diabetes trials (DCCT, UKPDS).
- Comparison of the mechanisms of action, efficacy (glycosylated hemoglobin reduction), and side effect profiles of oral antihyperglycemic agents.
- Analysis of agent suitability for patients with chronic renal failure.
Main Results:
- All oral antihyperglycemic classes, except Acarbose, reduce glycosylated hemoglobin by 1.0-1.5%.
- Significant differences exist among agents regarding mechanisms, efficacy, side effects, and cost.
- In chronic renal failure, repaglinide, nateglinide, and thiazolidinediones (with caution) are options, alongside insulin.
Conclusions:
- Intensive glucose control is vital but necessitates careful agent selection due to hypoglycemia risk.
- Oral antihyperglycemic agents offer varied therapeutic options, impacting treatment decisions.
- Insulin and specific oral agents can be safely used in patients with chronic renal failure, requiring careful consideration.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are typically...
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by the...
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors

