Related Experiment Videos
[Simulation of waiting time and effectiveness in hospitals]
Gunn Kristin Tjoflot1, Hans Th Waaler, Tor Iversen
1Institutt for helseledelse og helseøkonomi, Universitetet i Oslo, Postboks 1089, 0317 Oslo. gtjoflot@medisin.uio.no
Summary
Ring fencing elective surgery in hospitals may not improve efficiency. Simulation results suggest combined departments offer shorter waiting times, despite a risk of cancellations for elective patients.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Operations Research in Healthcare
Background:
- Norwegian hospitals frequently cancel elective surgeries due to acute cases.
- Ring fencing elective surgery is a proposed solution to manage capacity.
- This study evaluates the pros and cons of ring fencing using a simulation model.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of ring fencing elective surgery.
- To compare the outcomes of combined versus separate acute and elective surgical departments.
- To assess the impact of different organizational models on hospital efficiency and patient waiting times.
Main Methods:
- Simulation modeling was conducted using the Powersim Constructor 2.5 software.
- The model evaluated scenarios with combined and separate acute and elective surgical departments.
- Key performance indicators such as waiting time, overtime, and capacity utilization were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Combined departments showed shorter waiting times and less overtime due to flexible capacity use and higher utilization.
- Separate departments may enhance efficiency within the elective surgery unit, potentially reducing waiting times.
- Elective patients in combined departments face cancellation risks but benefit from potentially shorter overall waiting periods.
Conclusions:
- Ring fencing alone is not beneficial and can decrease total capacity utilization.
- Separate departments for elective surgery might improve departmental efficiency and shorten waiting lists.
- Optimizing capacity utilization and managing patient flow are critical for improving surgical scheduling.