Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Shift happens: using outcomes to survive and thrive under PPS.

Paul Rao1, Purvi Boradia, Jacqueline Ennis

  • 1Clinical Services, Quality Improvement, and Corporate Compliance, National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
|June 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Acute rehabilitation facilities must adapt to new payment systems by embracing technology and consumer-driven evaluation. This strategic shift is crucial for improving efficiency, patient outcomes, and ensuring industry survival.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rechallenging with clozapine following neutropenia: treatment options for refractory schizophrenia.

The American journal of psychiatry·2008
Same author

The relationship between functional independence scores on admission and patient falls after stroke.

Topics in stroke rehabilitation·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The post-prospective payment system (PPS) era presents significant challenges for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).
  • IRFs face demands for increased efficiency, such as reducing stroke patient length of stay.
  • Monitoring compliance with the 75% rule remains a critical requirement for IRFs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a paradigm shift in acute rehabilitation business models.
  • To explore the adoption of advanced technology and continuous quality improvement.
  • To promote a consumer-driven model for evaluating rehabilitation programs and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a strategic re-evaluation of current practices in marketing, care delivery, and outcome reporting.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It emphasizes the need for revised rehabilitation report cards tailored to diverse stakeholders.
  • The core method involves a conceptual argument for industry-wide change.

    • Main Results:

    • Adopting cutting-edge technology and continuous quality improvement can enhance IRF operations.
    • Evolving towards a consumer-driven program evaluation model can modify outcomes, indicators, and metrics.
    • Revised processes and reporting are key to market share and organizational success.

    Conclusions:

    • Acute rehabilitation providers must fundamentally change their business operations and program evaluation methods.
    • This evolution is essential for survival in the current healthcare landscape.
    • Improved processes and transparent, stakeholder-specific reporting are vital for achieving patient access, quality outcomes, safety, and functional gains.