Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responder and nonresponder analysis for a caries prevention program.

C H Splieth1, H Steffen, A Welk

  • 1Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pediatric Dentistry, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, Greifswald, Germany. Splieth@uni-greifswald.de

Caries Research
|June 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Satisfaction with dental treatment performed under nitrous oxide sedation: prospective questionnaire-based study.

European journal of paediatric dentistry·2025
Same author

[A rare cause of acute upper abdominal pain].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Effect of Choice of Flavor of Fluoride Varnish on Behavior in Dental Visits in Schoolchildren.

Clinical and experimental dental research·2025
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Response to "Need for postweaning data for dairy calves".

Journal of dairy science·2025
Same author

Efficiency of glass ionomer sealant application in reducing hypersensitivity in MIH-molars in schoolchildren immediately and after 12 weeks.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2025
Same author

The association of lung consolidation and respiratory pathogens identified at weaning on the growth performance of beef-on-dairy calves.

Journal of dairy science·2025

Children not participating in dental caries prevention programs often have poorer oral health. Non-responders showed higher caries and plaque levels, indicating potential disparities in preventive care uptake and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatric Dentistry
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Generalizability of research findings is often limited by unknown differences between study responders and non-responders.
  • Data comparing participants and non-participants in community health programs are frequently unavailable.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate interpretation of study results and effective public health interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if significant differences exist between children who participated in a school-based caries prevention program and those who did not.
  • To identify specific oral health characteristics and behaviors associated with non-response to preventive dental programs.
  • To inform future research and community-based oral health strategies.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A compulsory dental examination was conducted on 319 first and second graders in Greifswald, Germany.
  • Parental questionnaires assessed oral health topics and consent for program participation.
  • Comparison of oral health indices, preventive measures, and participation rates between responders (n=228) and non-responders (n=91).

Main Results:

  • Non-responders were significantly older on average than responders (8.5 vs. 8.1 years).
  • In age-adjusted analyses, non-responders showed higher caries and plaque levels across 21 of 30 indices.
  • Statistically significant differences were observed in caries prevalence in permanent dentition and fluorosis between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Children who do not participate in caries prevention programs may exhibit poorer oral health outcomes compared to participants.
  • Non-responders demonstrated lower adherence to preventive measures and higher disease indicators.
  • These findings highlight the need to consider non-response bias in oral health research and tailor community prevention programs to address potential disparities.