Related Experiment Videos
Health care reform in Germany: patchwork change within established governance structures
Christa Altenstetter1, Reinhard Busse
1Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
|June 10, 2005
Summary
German health care reform in the 1990s saw limited changes within statutory health insurance (SHI). Deeply ingrained traditions of self-governance and state power restrict significant policy innovation.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy and Management
- Socioeconomics of Health
- Comparative Health Systems
Background:
- The 1990s introduced health care reforms in Germany, impacting state, sickness fund, and provider interactions.
- This period is characterized as a potential "new era" for German statutory health insurance (SHI).
- Understanding these changes requires examining both long-term historical developments and short-term reform impacts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the extent and nature of changes in German statutory health insurance (SHI) during the 1990s reforms.
- To analyze the interplay between historical institutional factors and contemporary reform pressures.
- To identify barriers and opportunities for policy innovation within the German health care system.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of long-term developments in German statutory health insurance (SHI).
- Assessment of short-term developments and reform impacts during the 1990s.
- Examination of institutional rules, practices, and policy-making fragmentation.
Main Results:
- Highly institutionalized rules and practices, particularly SHI self-governance and state tradition, limit departures from the historical path.
- A fragmented policy-making system offers some, albeit limited, opportunities for introducing new ideas and modifying rules.
- Reforms are constrained by legal and administrative traditions, reinforcing state intervention and stifling innovation and coherent policy visions.
Conclusions:
- Despite reform pressures, German statutory health insurance (SHI) remains largely bound by historical governance structures.
- Policy innovation and implementation are hindered by established traditions and a tendency towards state intervention.
- Reform measures ultimately reinforce existing priorities within state and corporatist governance frameworks.