A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral family intervention for pediatric recurrent abdominal pain

Paul M Robins1, Suzanne M Smith, Joseph J Glutting

  • 1The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Psychology, 3405 Civic Center Blvd., CSH 15, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. robinsp@email.chop.edu.

Insights

Adding cognitive-behavioral family treatment (CBT) to standard medical care significantly reduced recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) and school absences in children. This combined approach offers a promising intervention for pediatric pain management.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Child Psychology
  • Behavioral Medicine

Background:

  • Recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) is a common condition in children, often leading to significant distress and healthcare utilization.
  • Standard medical care (SMC) alone may not fully address the complex biopsychosocial factors contributing to RAP.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of combining short-term cognitive-behavioral family treatment (CBT) with standard medical care (SMC) for pediatric RAP.
  • To compare the outcomes of SMC plus CBT against SMC alone in managing children's recurrent abdominal pain.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving children recently diagnosed with RAP.
  • Participants were assigned to either SMC or SMC plus CBT groups.
  • Outcomes assessed included child/parent-reported pain, somatization, functional disability, school absences, and physician contacts.

Main Results:

  • The SMC plus CBT group reported significantly less child and parent-reported abdominal pain compared to the SMC-only group, both immediately post-intervention and up to one year.
  • Significantly fewer school absences were observed in the combined treatment group.
  • No significant differences were found in functional disability or somatization between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • Short-term CBT, when integrated with SMC, effectively reduces the sensory experience of recurrent abdominal pain in children.
  • The findings support the value of combining medical and psychological interventions for pediatric RAP.
  • Further consideration of the cost-benefit of integrated care models is warranted.
Abstract