Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What makes targets redundant?

G R Grice1, J M Reed

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131.

Perception & Psychophysics
|May 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examined how redundant stimuli affect reaction time (RT). Go/no-go procedures are more sensitive than choice reaction time (CRT) for detecting redundancy gains.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The HARMONEE project: Using GenAI images for reminiscence with older adults in long-term care.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Investigating Metrics of Discrete-Individual Repeatability of the Stress Response.

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Stimulus intensity, catch trial effects, and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: A variable criterion theory interptation.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Reliability of a common solution-based taste perception test: implications for validity and a briefer test.

Eating behaviors·2011
Same author

Associative processes and strategies in disjunctive reaction time.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human factors
  • Experimental psychology

Background:

  • Reaction time (RT) is a fundamental measure in cognitive psychology.
  • Target-redundancy effects occur when multiple stimuli signal the same response.
  • Understanding these effects informs theories of visual attention and information processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate target-redundancy effects on reaction time (RT).
  • To compare the efficacy of choice reaction time (CRT) and go/no-go (GNG) procedures in detecting redundancy gains.
  • To examine how different types of redundant stimuli influence RT.

Main Methods:

  • Two letter-classification experiments were conducted using both CRT and GNG procedures.
  • Single-target conditions (with and without noise) and redundant-target conditions (identical and different class members) were employed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli varied in case (Experiment 1) or consisted of different capital letters (Experiment 2).

    • Main Results:

    • Redundancy gains were observed in the GNG experiments when comparing the different-targets condition to the no-noise, single-target condition.
    • Go/no-go procedures demonstrated greater sensitivity to redundancy effects compared to CRT.
    • Parallel processing of visually distinct stimuli that jointly activate a response was supported.

    Conclusions:

    • Go/no-go procedures are more sensitive than choice reaction time for investigating redundancy effects.
    • Redundant stimuli can lead to faster reaction times, particularly when stimuli are visually distinct.
    • Findings contribute to understanding parallel processing and response activation mechanisms.