Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Capacity limits in list item recognition: evidence from proactive interference.

Nelson Cowan1, Troy D Johnson, J Scott Saults

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. CowanN@missouri.edu

Memory (Hove, England)
|June 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a comprehensive account of verbal memory: An embedded computational model across representational domains.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Cue-driven attentional guidance nearly eliminates salience effects in working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Long-term representational costs of overloading working memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

No evidence yet for functional independence of verbal short-term memory and long-term verbal knowledge.

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Colors, characters, locations, and shapes: The capacity of working memory for multiple, dissimilar sets of items.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Multilab Direct Replication of Flavell, Beach, and Chinsky (1966): Spontaneous Verbal Rehearsal in a Memory Task as a Function of Age.

Advances in methods and practices in psychological science·2025

This study explored short-term recall limits using proactive interference (PI). Findings suggest working memory capacity is around four items, supporting an activation-based model.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Short-term recall is fundamental to cognitive function.
  • Understanding working memory capacity limits is crucial for cognitive models.
  • Proactive interference (PI) is a known factor affecting memory recall.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate capacity limits in short-term recall.
  • To examine the role of proactive interference (PI) in determining these limits.
  • To propose an activation-based account for working memory capacity.

Main Methods:

  • A speeded-recognition task was employed.
  • Participants performed recall tasks with varying list lengths.
  • Proactive interference (PI) was manipulated using concurrent or sequential word presentation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A novel method was used to increase PI levels.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants recalled approximately four items when no proactive interference (PI) was present.
    • The amount of PI correlated with list length, indicating capacity exceedance.
    • Presentation method (concurrent vs. sequential) influenced PI effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Working memory capacity appears to be limited to about four items.
    • An activation-based model can account for observed capacity limitations.
    • The study provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying short-term memory constraints.