Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Class II deep bite faces: one-phase or two-phase treatment?

Andre J Horn1, Isabelle Thiers-Jegou

  • 1andre.horn@wanadoo.fr

World Journal of Orthodontics
|June 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Successful Class II treatment for low-angle patients involves early orthopedic and orthodontic phases during mixed dentition. This approach minimizes trauma and anchorage needs, often avoiding extractions and surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

A review of the clinical applications of elastic tractions in orthodontics.

World journal of orthodontics·2011
Same journal

Positional changes of the lips concomitant to incisor retraction: an important issue in orthodontics.

World journal of orthodontics·2011
Same journal

Slovenia to welcome the 86th EOS Congress in 2010.

World journal of orthodontics·2011
Same journal

AAO offers support to WFO Executive Committee, strengthens connections with WFO affiliates.

World journal of orthodontics·2011
Same journal

World Village Day provides global exposure to participating WFO affiliate organizations.

World journal of orthodontics·2011
Same journal

Symposium on Orthodontic Certifying Boards ignites interest in board certification.

World journal of orthodontics·2011

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dentofacial Orthopedics

Background:

  • Class II malocclusion treatment timing is critical for stable outcomes.
  • Low-angle Class II patients typically benefit from two-phase treatment: orthopedics followed by orthodontics during mixed dentition.

Observation:

  • Vertical facial patterns, specifically high-angle versus low-angle, dictate treatment strategy (extraction vs. nonextraction).
  • Low-angle cases often require soft tissue expansion and are frequently treated nonextraction (70% in the authors' practice).

Findings:

  • A nonextraction, two-phase approach for low-angle Class II patients reduces treatment trauma and anchorage demands.
  • This orthodontic concept simplifies mechanics and often obviates the need for surgical intervention.

Implications:

Related Experiment Videos

  • This approach offers a less traumatic, potentially non-surgical pathway for managing low-angle Class II malocclusions.
  • Future orthodontic practice may shift towards conceptual understanding and reduced reliance on complex mechanics.