Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
Julien Voisin1, Guillaume Michaud, C Elaine Chapman
1Centre de Recherche en Sciences Neurologiques, Département de Physiologie, Université de Montréal, 6128, Succursale Centre Ville, Montréal, QC, Canada, H3C 3J7.
Abstract:
This study investigates how a change in the physical relation between objects (two-dimensional, 2-D, angles) and a subject, as well as scanning conditions, modify the ability to discriminate small changes in 2-D shape. Subjects scanned pairs of angles (90 masculine standard; 91 masculine-103 masculine comparison angles) with the right index finger of the out-stretched arm, identifying the larger of each pair. When joint rotation was restricted to the shoulder, the discrimination threshold significantly increased when the angles were explored with the shoulder in a more eccentric position rather than closer to the midline (60 masculine versus 30 masculine to the right). This result was attributed to changes in proprioceptive sensitivity, since explorations restricted to distal joints (wrist/second metacarpophalangeal joint) showed no change with shoulder position. The results showed, moreover, that discrimination threshold was similar for distal and proximal joints when the delay between scanning the pairs of angles was long (15 s). This observation suggests that regional variations in proprioceptive acuity (proximal>distal) may reflect an adaptation to generate an invariant central representation of haptic shape. Using a shorter interscan delay (5 s), a position-dependent increase in discrimination threshold was revealed for distal explorations, an effect that disappeared when the head was turned in the direction of the unseen angle (vision occluded). We suggest that these results can be explained by the existence of two competing egocentric frames of reference with different time courses, one of short duration that is centred on the arm/hand, and a second of longer duration centred on the head. At the short delay, the reference frames interacted to distort the haptic representation when they were misaligned. This distortion was resolved at the long delay, possibly through suppression of the arm/hand-centred reference frame.
Related Concept Videos
Somatosensation
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Gestalt Principles of Perception

