Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

One-trial visual recognition in cats.

Vazha Okujava1, Teimuraz Natishvili, Mortimer Mishkin

  • 1Research Center for Experimental Neurology, 2-a Gudamakari Str., 0192, Tbilisi, Georgia. okujava@geo.net.ge.

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
|June 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frontal and Insular Input to the Dorsolateral Temporal Pole in Primates: Implications for Auditory Memory.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2019
Same author

A Comparison of Auditory Oddball Responses in Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Basolateral Amygdala, and Auditory Cortex of Macaque.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2019
Same author

Chronometry on Spike-LFP Responses Reveals the Functional Neural Circuitry of Early Auditory Cortex Underlying Sound Processing and Discrimination.

eNeuro·2018
Same author

Phonological working memory and FOXP2.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Thalamic connections of the core auditory cortex and rostral supratemporal plane in the macaque monkey.

The Journal of comparative neurology·2017
Same author

Hippocampal damage and memory impairment in congenital cyanotic heart disease.

Hippocampus·2016
Same journal

Chronic pantoprazole exposure induces behavioral deficits and region‑specific molecular changes in the rat motor cortex and cerebellum.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
Same journal

Modulation of electrically evoked hippocampal epileptiform activity by exogenous orexins in the rat CA1 field.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
Same journal

The effect of clozapine and GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor drugs on scopolamine‑induced amnesia in male mice.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
Same journal

<i>LRRK2</i> mutations: at the crossroads of dopamine, iron, and calcium imbalance in Parkinson's disease.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in multiple sclerosis: Recent findings of clinical studies and animal models.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
Same journal

Microglia up‑regulate thromboxane A2 synthesis genes in response to C6 glioma‑conditioned medium.

Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis·2026
See all related articles

Cats demonstrate impressive long-term recognition memory, learning matching and nonmatching tasks similarly to monkeys. However, cats showed less preference for novelty and struggled with locomotor tasks due to visuospatial strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior
  • Comparative Psychology

Background:

  • Monkeys exhibit a strong preference for novelty, impacting their learning of matching and nonmatching-to-sample tasks.
  • Understanding feline cognitive abilities, particularly memory, requires comparative studies with well-established models like primates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate cats' capacity for delayed matching- and nonmatching-to-sample tasks using trial-unique stimuli.
  • To compare feline learning rates and strategies with those of monkeys in similar cognitive tasks.
  • To explore the influence of response modality (manipulatory vs. locomotor) on cats' performance.

Main Methods:

  • Cats were trained on delayed matching- and nonmatching-to-sample tasks in a modified Wisconsin General Testing Apparatus (WGTA) and a Nencki-type testing room.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Tasks involved manipulatory responses in the WGTA and locomotor responses in the testing room.
  • Performance was assessed across varying delay intervals to evaluate long-term recognition memory.

    • Main Results:

    • Cats learned both matching and nonmatching tasks at comparable rates in the WGTA, unlike monkeys.
    • Cats did not show a significant preference for novelty, learning both rules at similar speeds.
    • Cats learned manipulatory tasks more readily than locomotor tasks, with visuospatial strategies interfering in the latter.
    • Cats exhibited robust long-term recognition memory, performing well even after 10-minute delays.

    Conclusions:

    • Cats possess advanced long-term recognition memory, comparable to that of monkeys.
    • Feline cognitive strategies differ from monkeys', particularly regarding novelty preference.
    • Visuospatial strategies can pose a challenge for cats in locomotor cognitive tasks.