Efficacy of a SHIV 89.6 proviral DNA vaccine against mucosal SIVmac239 challenge

Marc Busch1, Kristina Abel, Jun Li

  • 1California National Primate Research Center, University California-Davis, County Road 98, Hutchison Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Vaccine
|June 21, 2005
PubMed

Insights

Immunizing rhesus macaques with a plasmid encoding simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) resulted in less protection against pathogenic SIV than live attenuated SHIV. Delayed infection from plasmid delivery may reduce vaccine effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Sixty percent of rhesus macaques infected with attenuated SHIV 89.6 are protected from pathogenic SIVmac239 challenge.
  • Previous studies show that inoculation with a proviral plasmid encoding SHIV 89.6 (pMA SHIV-89.6) leads to delayed systemic infection compared to SHIV 89.6 virus inoculation.
  • The effectiveness of live attenuated vaccines can be influenced by the route and timing of immunization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the protective efficacy of immunization with pMA SHIV-89.6 versus SHIV 89.6 virus against subsequent intravaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239.
  • To investigate the immunological correlates of protection in rhesus macaques immunized with either pMA SHIV-89.6 or SHIV 89.6 virus.

Main Methods:

  • Rhesus macaques were inoculated with either pMA SHIV-89.6 or SHIV 89.6 virus.
  • Animals were subsequently challenged intravaginally with pathogenic SIVmac239.
  • Plasma anti-SIV binding antibody titers, IFN-gamma secreting cell responses, and cytokine profiles were measured.

Main Results:

  • A smaller proportion of monkeys immunized with pMA SHIV-89.6 were protected from SIVmac239 challenge compared to those immunized with SHIV 89.6 virus.
  • Protected DNA-immunized monkeys exhibited stronger anti-SIV IFN-gamma ELISPOT responses during the acute post-challenge stage.
  • Plasma antibody titers and PBMC cytokine responses post-challenge were similar between protected and unprotected DNA-immunized groups.

Conclusions:

  • The delayed systemic infection resulting from pMA SHIV-89.6 delivery decreased the effectiveness of this live attenuated vaccine candidate.
  • While IFN-gamma responses are important, they may not fully compensate for delayed systemic infection in vaccine efficacy.
  • These findings highlight the importance of the timing of systemic infection in the context of live attenuated viral vaccine strategies.

Related Concept Videos