Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026
A Plasma Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry using an Automated Workstation
Published on: April 24, 2020
Evaluation of analytical methods and workflow performance of the Architect ci8200 integrated serum/plasma analyzer
Walter Hubl1, Martina Zogbaum, James C Boyd
1Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, 41, D-01067 Dresden, Germany.
Background:
The Architect ci8200 is an integrated serum analyzer for photometric, electrochemical and immunological assays. Several assays of each category and the workflow performance of the system were compared with established laboratory procedures in two laboratories.
Methods:
Measurements were compared with the ELECSYS 2010 (Roche Diagnostics) for CEA, PSA, FPSA, AFP, folate, vitamin B12, with the CENTAUR (Bayer) for TSH, T4, FT4, FSH and Estradiol, with the LIAISON (DiaSorin) for TSH, FT4 and FT3, with the Behring Nephelometer BN II (Dade-Behring) for ferritin, and with the INTEGRA 800 (Roche Diagnostics), and the AU640 (Olympus) for clinical chemistry assays. Workflow studies were performed to compare times of analysis required for defined analytical workloads.
Results:
The coefficients of variation (CVs) for within-run imprecision were between 3% and 6% for CEA, PSA, FPSA, AFP and ferritin, and between 3% and 11% for TSH, FT4, FT3, folate and vitamin B12. The CVs for day-to-day imprecision for immunoassays were between 3% and 10%, except for vitamin B12 (CVs 11-13%) and FT4 (CV 10% -13%). For clinical chemistry tests corresponding CVs for within-run imprecision were < 1%, except for HDL, triglyceride, creatinine, ALT, LD and lipase (CVs<2%) and bicarbonate (CV 3%-6%) and magnesium (CV < 3%). The CVs for day-to-day imprecision for clinical chemistry tests were < 1%, except for sodium, CO(2), magnesium, phosphorus, glucose, uric acid, HDL, triglyceride, ALT, AST CK, lipase with CVs < 6% and for CO(2)<11%. Dilutional linearity testing of seven immunoassays and five clinical chemistry analytes resulted in recovery rates of 90-110%. Correlation studies with 15 immunoassays and 25 clinical chemistry tests showed acceptable agreements with established methods. Work flow analyses demonstrated a net gain in time of analysis up to 109 min depending on the size of the sample batch analyzed with the Architect ci8200 as the main analyzer as compared to the currently installed routine laboratory equipment. Median turn-around times were 7 and 30 min for chemistry assays and immunoassays, respectively, when ordered as STAT analyses, and 18 min when chemistry assays were ordered as routine determinations.
Conclusions:
Assays on the Architect ci8200 performed well, fulfilling quality control requirements as defined for instance by German quality control guidelines (RiliBAK). Method comparisons showed acceptable agreements with established assays. Workflow studies using the Architect ci8200 documented shorter times of analyses as compared with the conventionally established laboratory routine demonstrating the potential of integrated chemistry/immunoassay analyzers to provide faster and more efficient performance.
